No i would not recommend going to court because i'm sure if he has the money to get a lawyer then he should have the money to replace his damaged goods
Hope this helps :)
I think the answer is A :)
Answer: It is a proper question
Explanation:
The witness is making a claim about what had transpired between the defendant and the plaintiff and in order for their testimony to stand, they need to have integrity such that a reasonable person can believe their testimony in this case.
In asking about the false claim that the witness had once filed, the defendant is trying to establish that the witness has no integrity and so in proving their untruthfulness, the defendant hopes to convince the court that the witness does not have enough integrity to be a witness.
Answer:
Revised the three strikes law to impose life sentence only when the new felony conviction is "serious or violent."
Explanation:
Proposition 36 modified elements of California's "Three Strikes" Law, which was approved by the state's voters in 1994. In 2004, voters rejected Proposition 66, which like the 2012 measure was an attempt to change some aspects of the original "Three Strikes" Law.
