1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Simora [160]
3 years ago
11

A triangle in the coordinate plane has coordinates of (2,3), (-4,-5), and (-2, 4). It is reflected about the y-axis. What are it

s new coordinates?
Mathematics
2 answers:
Anestetic [448]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I got A. (-2,3) (4,-5) (2,4)

chubhunter [2.5K]3 years ago
5 0
(-2,3) (4,-5) (2,4) you change the x value to to its opposite. 
You might be interested in
5x-4=-3-x so ya can yall help
Ket [755]

Step-by-step explanation:

5x-4=-3-x

5x+x=4+(-3)

6x=1

x=1/6

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Subtract fractions like 42/7- 2 1/5
dangina [55]

Answer:

3.8 in decimal form, or 3 4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

I just used a calculator, sorry :(

anyways, hope this helped! :)

6 0
3 years ago
Which expression is equivalent to the given expression?<br> (-4ab)3
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

-64a³b³

Step-by-step explanation:

please like and Mark as brainliest

6 0
4 years ago
Consider the following proposed proof by contradiction that for all positive integers n, 3n &gt; 2.
laila [671]

Answer:

The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.

This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.

A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.

To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."

7 0
3 years ago
How would u do this question?
Anton [14]
I’m not sure but try connects it helps me a lot with my math homework
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Height of the pyramid in the diagram is three times the radius of the cone.The base area of the pyramid is the same as the b
    5·1 answer
  • 9.12cm<br> 10.36cm<br> 11.34cm<br> 12.61cm
    7·1 answer
  • If 15 basketballs weigh 75 ounces, how many basketballs weigh 15 ounces?
    12·2 answers
  • 4 over x+4 - 2 over x+1
    5·1 answer
  • In order to estimate the height of all students at your university, let's assume you have measured the height of all psychology
    15·1 answer
  • Evaluate the expression for v=1.<br><br><br>4[v]+15[ ]
    15·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE !!!!!!!!!!!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Answer all questions thoroughly, pls!!
    7·1 answer
  • Hi I did 1st 2 but need help with rest simplifying these and I need them explained step by step plz and thank you
    7·1 answer
  • Factorize ax^2 + bx by using identities
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!