An example for that question is: Who among the population would be satisfied with the global handicap?
Surely, the government admnistrators would feel most accomplished and relieved living in a world where nobody holds the wits, brawn, or beauty to challenge their positions. After all, in any society, someone must stand out above all the others to be a successful ruler. But regarding the populace, would it be possible for anyone to feel satisfied with this imposed lifestyle? Or would it be considered too "ingenious" to feel otherwise?
For some, this could be an utopia; For the to-be handicapped, it is opression.
The author claims in the excerpt that antislavery rhetoric in the late eighteenth century was based on:
The belief that emancipated people would not be a presence in society.
- This question is based on the book "Disowning Slavery: Gradual Emancipation and 'Race' in New England, 1780-1860," by Joanne Pope Melish.
- According to the author, Whites in the late 18th century developed a certain antislavery rhetoric.
- Their antislavery rhetoric was based on their belief that freed slaves would, all of a sudden, disappear.
- In other words, Whites believed emancipated slaves would not become a part of society.
Learn more about the subject here:
brainly.com/question/9280794?referrer=searchResults
The complete excerpt for this question can be found attached below:
Answer: A. Simile: A comparison between two unlike things using words such as: like, as, than, similar to, resembles, etc.
The answer is true. Food borne illnesses are illnesses transferred to people by infected food. Hope i helped. Have a nice day.
Is there a package I need to read
