1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
polet [3.4K]
3 years ago
9

The destruction of the berlin wall in 1989 is symbolic of the

History
2 answers:
grin007 [14]3 years ago
6 0

<em><u>The destruction of the Berlin Wall</u></em> <u>is the symbol of</u> <em><u>the reunification of Germany and</u></em> <u>the dissolution of the USSR. The symbolic point of the end of communism was from 9 to 10 November 1989.</u>

Svetach [21]3 years ago
4 0
The Berlin wall was a barrier that existed from 1961 to 1989 throughout conflict and separated East and city district. It symbolized the distinction between western democrats and jap communists (end of soviet domination) and therefore the method they thought FRG ought to be lead. Fall of Berlin wall could be a major event in European history. The policies of restructuring and openness initiated by soviet leader Mikhail opened the trail for the destruction of the symbolic physical barrier.
You might be interested in
In north america, where did slavery mostly exist? a. west b. north c. midwest d. south
kherson [118]
The correct answer is D
4 0
3 years ago
Help please with this
vovangra [49]

Answer: The 1920s was the first decade to have a nickname: “Roaring 20s" or "Jazz Age." It was a decade of prosperity and dissipation, and of jazz bands, bootleggers, raccoon coats, bathtub gin, flappers, flagpole sitters, bootleggers, and marathon dancers. (america was a booming age )

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Size control of egypt throne and made herself pharaoh
agasfer [191]
Are u asking who seized the Egyptian throne and made herself pharaoh? If so, I think the answer is Cleopatra.
7 0
3 years ago
Discuss the complex relationship between the United States and Canada in the Cold War era. Address both positives and negatives
muminat

Answer:

After the mid-20th century , Canada and the United States became extremely close partners. Canada was a close allie of USA during the Cold War.

William Lyon Mackenzie King (Prime minister) rejected free trade with the United States.

August 1957, the Canadian/American governments said they were going to integrate their air forces under a split command called the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD). This time during The Cold War, both Canada and the US feared long-range Soviet attack.

7 0
3 years ago
One of Rome's greatest contributions to civilization is the
Elodia [21]

Answer:

A) Justinian Code

Explanation:

The Civil Law, Common Law, or Islamic Law are the three main sources of law in the world today.

Roman Law served as the foundation for the Civil Law. Law was viewed as personal rather than territorial in the defunct Western Empire. Thus, during the rule of the germanic monarchs, "vulgar roman law" continued in Italy where Italians were still ostensibly subject to the same rules. According to Gratian's work, Canon Law had a significant role in the formation of the Civil Law, which also drew on Roman Law for its principles and practices.

But the Digest—the bulk of Justinian's Code—was crucial to the Civil Law. The Digest was found in Italy and extensively studied by the University of Bologna's Glossators, who later inspired other generations of academics throughout Europe and Italy. Though they are frequently criticized for having created a relatively ahistorical vision of the law, the academics endeavored to resolve contradictions, to defend existing practices, and to recreate the language and intellectual background of the Digest.

The Digest-derived law was adopted into national law from European universities. It was formally promulgated in the HRE. It was supposed that it was still in force elsewhere. Others embraced it without any kind of express enactment and viewed it as "learned law." More information about this subject may be found in just about any book on the development of law in Europe (or a specific European nation).

The scholastics and later humanist and natural law philosophers also embraced the Digest-related studies. The authors of Latin treatises like Pufendorf and Grotius—two titans of international law—clearly carry on the Digest's legacy. The Latin authors are followed by treatise authors in various national languages. It takes just a short detour from the final French writers in the natural law tradition to the French Civil Code, which enacts their works.

The rest of Europe also adopts laws in the century that follows the adoption of the French Civil Code. A few are taken straight from the French Code. Some are a blend, including aspects of regional law and local romanistic heritage.

Later, Japan adopted the Civil Law, which also served as the foundation for the Communist legal systems.

Less directly, the Digest has an impact on common law. The Inns of Court in England, who were supporters of the traditional legal system, which had developed in a way that (at least procedurally) more closely resembled the classical Roman Law than the more imperial version that Tribonian would have known, controlled a large portion of the country's legal system. Although the "learned law" was not acknowledged in English courts, English colleges would have provided teaching in it.

But Justinian's Code did have an impact. Bracton, Coke, Hale, and other English treatise authors have obviously studied the code or read authors who have. Similar sections in Justinian serve as the inspiration for important passages in these English writers that discuss the sources and goals of law. Even if the substance of these works are occasionally very diverse, the arrangement of them does appear to be derived from the code.

It is also clear that English law would borrow concepts from the European jus commune (the nascent Civil Law) sometimes awkwardly. For instance, English law lacks the all-important distinction between ownership and possession found in Roman law -- possession in English law is a practical concept (you have it) not a technical one. Thus, when English law borrows Roman property law (which was quite sophisticated) it must sometimes create strange kludges. English law also lacked the elegance of Roman law with respect to easements, and has really only settled at the same point as the Digest in the past few decades.

My knowledge skips a few centuries at this point, but by the time we get to America, common lawyers are citing "the Civil Law" frequently, and what they mean by this is a very influential translation of Justinian's Institutes (not the Digest). The Institutes were particularly seen as relevant in the context of the American law of slavery, because English law lacked a suitable antecedent. But even in more mundane cases, Justinian is cited, and during the 19th century it would be easy to purchase a copy of the Institutes with footnotes to American decisions, just as one could purchase many abridgments of Blackstone with footnotes to American decisions.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the longest-lasting effect of the losses in World War II?
    13·1 answer
  • People who vote republican for national office but democratic for state and local office are known as
    11·1 answer
  • What is the main reason the US Civil
    8·1 answer
  • The result of the Marshall Plan aid to the countries of Western Europe was that
    11·1 answer
  • Who is a powerful ruler who wanted to conquer Europe and sold LA to USA
    7·1 answer
  • Why good citizenship is important and also what can happen is peopl do not have good citizenship
    12·2 answers
  • What did Roman engineers build to resolve the lack of water in cities?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did a colored farmers form?
    9·2 answers
  • Water is regulated by the USDA.<br> -False<br> -True
    15·2 answers
  • Why did towns offer greater freedom to peasants?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!