Read the excerpt below and answer the question.

English

2 answers:

tamaranim1 [39]2 years ago

7 0

C+D because it makes the most sense.

FinnZ [79.3K]2 years ago

3 0

The correct answers would be option C: " It expresses his nearly subterranean sense of isolation" and option D: "It illustrates how he leads an almost subhuman existence". In the excerpt, the author is describing the character's home and comparing it to animals lair's, animals that keep to themselves in nature, therefore one can infer that the character also keeps to himself (in isolation) and that he possess animal qualities that make it seem he leads a subhuman existence.

Options A and B are incorrect because the author does not give any reference in the excerpt so as to assume the character is single minded or looking to the future.

You might be interested in

Write a letter to a friend who has left the school

bulgar [2K]

Answer:

Dear Friend,

Its been awhile since we talked. I uh just thought Id write to ummm.....to check on you. How are you doing? Anything interesting happen or exciting happen? I'm fine, you know just doing what I usually do. I hope your okay and safe. Take care, stay safe.

-Your friend

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Musya8 [376]

For Dyson, the "ultimate danger" is the use of genetic engineering in human embryos. He supports this information by showing how it changes human nature.

<h3>What is genetic engineering?</h3>

It is the manipulation of an organism's genes.
It is the manipulation of the nucleic acids of an organism.
It's a set of molecular techniques.

For Dyson, the use of genetic engineering in human embryos is very dangerous, as it modifies what is natural and does not foresee the damage and negative consequences that this can cause in the long and short term.

More information about genetic engineering is at the link:

brainly.com/question/13491558

5 0

1 year ago

One way an English sonnet is different from a Petrarchan sonnet because an English sonnet contains

Morgarella [4.7K]

An english sonnet contains 3 quatrains and a finishing couplet. a petrarchan sonnet contains an octave and a sestet.

the english sonnet has a couplet where a petrarchan sonnet does not. neither have 5 quatrains.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Based on context clues, the best definition for the word “malevolent” in the excerpt above is

UNO [17]

The correct answer is (C) wishing I'll on others.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

what is more important what a person thinks or what a preson thinks or what a preson does write a short essay regarding the topi

VikaD [51]

A person can think however they want. Actions, like many have said, define a person in the end. Someone can advocate for peace with malicious intent, but they will still likely be remembered for advocating peace and not for their impure motivations. If these contradicting images are revealed to the public, that is still an act against that person, and is no longer a thought.

However, this is only from the public's view. When it comes to people, they may as well be the embodiment of their thoughts. Everything is fueled by something. The same person who seeds their own goals under the guise of peace will not think of themselves as one who acts with the intentions of bringing peace. They will be looking to call forth whatever it is that they want, and be aware that what they present to the public is not the truth.

So, both points are arguable. It depends on whether you value the individual or the community. Actions are what are remembered, and thoughts are a person's reason. Even today, this comes into relevancy because people want to know why certain figures in history did what they did. Thoughts make a person human, after all. Without thought, seperation of man and beast would be nigh impossible. Without action, man would have been left behind long ago. Both thought and action are important indeed.

8 0

3 years ago