The answer to the first unknown is "FRATERNAL TWINS" while in the second unknown is "SISTERS". Hence, we have it, Mia and Thalia are very similar to each other especially with respect to their appearances and to each other in the personality trait of openness. While Esther and Hannah are less similar to one another in openness. We can say that Mia and Thalia could be FRATERNAL TWINS, whereas Esther and Hannah could be SISTERS.
Answer:
its underlying but censored meaning
Explanation:
Latent Dream Content
Psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud gave his theory of the latent content of a dream. It is said that it is the hidden psychological meaning of the dream. He stated that that the content of dreams is connected to fulfillment of a wish and gave the meaning that dreams have two types of content which are the manifest content and latent content.
The manifest content deals with actual literal subject-matter of the dream. The latent content deals with the underlying meaning of these symbols.
This is probably because scientific journals get cross-referenced and peer-reviewed by other mainstream scientific organizations whereas a regular webpage can tell you just about anything without anything to back it up. Their credibility isn't as high.
John Locke was a political philosopher who wrote on the necessity of the separation of powers in government as well as the necessity of revolution in overthrowing unjust government. These two values had an enormous impact on both the Declaration of Independence and also the American Constitution. Montesquieu was also an important philosophical thinker who wrote on the value in the separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judiciary. In addition Montesquieu believed in the creation of a system of checks and balances between the branches of government which also greatly influenced the writing of the American Constitution and the creation of the U.S. Government.
Answer: It produces inefficient economic results under certain conditions
Explanation: The above situation is known as the paradox of voting,which tries to show that the cost of voting will always be higher than the result obtained from the voting process.This is because Majority voting undermines the importance of an individual voter. This issue was first highlighted in 1793 by Nicolas de Condorcet,where noted that in a single stage election the influence of a single voter reduces as the number of voters increase.
The paradox of voting further highlights that the expected results/outcome of a voter from an electioneering process is less than what the initial expectations.
