He believes the role of the king is <span>to rule with complete authority over his subjects.
He compared the power of the king as the power of the God Himself. He believe that as long as the king is residing in His rightful nation/domain, all of His Desire would be met and all people within the nation/domain shall follow the King's order without hestitation.</span>
Answer:
The mission of the Pacific Islands Forum is “to work in support of Forum member governments, to enhance the economic and social well-being of the people of the South Pacific by fostering cooperation between governments and between international agencies, and by representing the interests of Forum members in ways agreed by the Forum”. Its decisions are implemented by the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (PIFS), which grew out of the South Pacific Bureau for Economic Co-operation (SPEC). As well as its role in harmonising regional positions on various political and policy issues, the Forum Secretariat has technical programmes in economic development, transport and trade. The Pacific Islands Forum Secretary General is the permanent Chairman of the council of region organizations in the Pacific
hope this helps u ;)
Explanation:
Answer:
if you use goods produced in your own country, these goods need less transport. less transport means lower cost and lower burden on the environment.
Explanation:
Development occurs in many types depends upon how u want it to develop and how you helping in it to develop it more easily. As per the psychologists (Developmental psychologists), the development of an individual or child occurs in a orderly or sequential way and in different areas simultaneously.
Answer:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. Regulation of foreign commerce is exclusively a federal power because of the need for the federal government to speak with one voice when regulating commercial relations with foreign governments. The existence of legitimate state interests underlying state legislation will not justify state regulation of foreign commerce. The state statute, in imposing requirements for a license costing $50 and for a clear marking of goods as being from a foreign country, clearly is an attempt by the state to restrict or even eliminate the flow of such goods in foreign commerce. Thus, the statute is unconstitutional.
