not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
Answer:
Private Psychotherapy.
Explanation:
Psychotherapy is a treatment to help a person with mental ailment by talking with a professional (mental health provider or psychiatrist). It is a therapy that helps a person with mental problem through communication to overcome the problem. This therapy helps the patient to achieve a positive outlook of life.
<u>In the given situation, the police officer is imitating the principles of private psychotherapy. By treating the homeless man with respect, caring, and helping him to have a positive outlook towards life are the principles applied by a psychiatrist or mental health provider to help the person overcome his mental illness.</u>
And, as per the studies, homeless people are more prone to mental illness. Thus, the officer perfomed a private psychotherapy on the homeless person.
Thus the correct answer is Private psychotherapy.
I’m pretty sure the answer is D :)
Answer:
Is initially neutral, and then comes to trigger a response.
Explanation:
In classical conditioning the conditioned stimulus is a previously neutral stimulus which gradually comes to cause a conditioned response after being associated with the unconditioned stimulus. Classical conditioning is a type of learning in which a conditioned stimulus is combined with an unrelated unconditioned stimulus to elicit a behavioral response known as a conditioned response. A response occurs with more regularity in a well-specified, stable environment. One of the key components of conditioning is a conditioned environment.
Paralanguage <span>includes all voiced parts of communication other than words themselves.
Paralanguage is the term that doesn't really refer to the meaning of what you speak, but rather to everything else, such as your intonation, gestures, facial expressions, pitch and speed of your speech, hesitation noises such as erm, uh, etc.
</span>
