<span>an organism's expectation that a US will follow
a CS</span>
Answer:
Answer is C, were directed to the imperial powers in Europe and Asia.
Explanation:
The "Open door notes" which was initially known as the "Open door policy" , was created or proposed in 1899 by John Hay who was the the secretary of state.
The aim or purpose of the policy or note was that the Chinese market should be open to all parties, that is , countries. This means that , no particular country should gain or have total control over that region.
It should be noted that during that time, there was intense competition to exert control over China among the countries in America and Europe. This is because, at that time the Chinese government was not that strong.
Then , the open door policy or note was created to avoid or prevent conflict that may arise or occur over the Chinese market.
Answer: <span>C. treatment of an open wound that requires stitches; cutting of fingernails on a diabetic patient. </span>
Given choices for the question includes:
<span>· </span>A. eyeglass fitting; eye examination by an optometrist.
<span>· </span>B. psychological counseling; psychiatric counseling.
<span>· </span>C. treatment of an open wound that requires stitches; cutting of fingernails on a diabetic patient.
<span>· </span>D. contact lens sale; contact lens fitting.
<span>· </span>E. flu shot; blood test.
<span>According to the quality hypothesis of licensure, one would expect the degree of licensure to be greater for treatment of open would that requires stitches than cutting of fingernails on a diabetic patient.</span>
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
Equality is giving everyone the same amount of something. Equity is giving those who are in need more of something in order to help them be equal with others. For example, an equalist will give everyone the same amount of food regardless of their size. An equitist, on the other hand, will give food in accordance to one's size. In my opinion, both have their pros and cons.
