All categories

4 years ago

Charlotte paid $4 for a movie download. The monetary amount is the download's _____ .

2 answers:

8 0

<span>Charlotte paid $4 for a movie download. The monetary amount is the download's retail price. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or the last option. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has come to your desired help.</span>

NNADVOKAT [17]4 years ago

7 0

Answer:

I think your answer is option 3

<em><u>retail price</u></em>.

You might be interested in

Which of the following is not an example of a natural experiment an economist might use to evaluate a theory? a. Transit ridersh

Verdich [7]

Answer:

Example of not a natural experiment an economist might use to evaluate a theory is:

C. Here the Students in a microeconomics principles course are advised to play a game with their classmates to determine and evaluate what all decisions they make under certain adjusted circumstances.

Explanation:

Natural experiment : A natural experiment is referred to an observational and also an empirical study in which we get to study about the experimental and controllable varieties of variables. which can not het manipulated anywhere by the researchers.

Instead these experiments are allowed to affect the environment and the nature or the different factors which are not under control of our researchers. In contrast to the experimental values and all the natural experiments are even not controlled by the researchers but instead they also admire and obseve those experiments for their own studies.

So, the right option is:

C. Here the Students in a microeconomics principles course are advised to play a game with their classmates to determine and evaluate what all decisions they make under certain adjusted circumstances.

7 0

4 years ago

Read and compare the following two scenarios. Explain why the court should or should not pierce the corporate veil in each scena

Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer:

Piercing the Corporate Veil:

1. Smith Services, Inc. and Laker Express: With the given facts, Smith Services is still in operation by the alter ego, since Smith - the sole owner, has continued to provide trucking services. Smith should be able to pay for the debts it owed Laker Express. The question is: why was Smith Services, Inc. dissolved in the first place when the sole owner could continue privately to do the same business? Is there element of fraud involved, or was it trying to avoid its obligations? It seems that the dissolution was an effort to avoid liabilities and not because of impaired ability to operate the business because its own debtors did not pay for services on several contracts. Another question is: during the dissolution or liquidation of Smith Services, Inc. were other creditors not settled and where was Laker Express then?

However, it appears that the dissolution was just to avoid liability, especially the $35,000 debt owed to Laker Express for fuel purchases.

Therefore, in this situation where it seems that the corporate form is ignored, commingling of assets exists, and that Smith Services, Inc. is an instrumentality for Tony Smith, I will advise that the corporate veil be lifted. Tony Smith should be held liable for the business debts of Smith Services, Inc. because he has continued to use the assets of Smith Services, Inc. to run a sole proprietorship in the same line of business. However, recourse must be had to the State laws on piercing the corporate veil.

2. Country Contractors, Inc. & Westside Storage of Indianapolis:

Since Country Contractors, Inc and the Westside Storage are based in Indiana, the decision to pierce the corporate veil should be based on the eight factors that are applicable for piercing the veil: They include: undercapitalization; absence of corporate records; fraudulent representation by corporation shareholders or directors; use of the corporation to promote fraud, injustice or illegal activities; payment by the corporation of individual obligations; commingling of assets and affairs; failure to observe required corporate formalities; or other shareholder acts or conduct ignoring, controlling, or manipulating the corporate form.

But, the facts in this case do not support that any of the factors had been breached.

So, I do not support that Songers are personally liable for Country's failure to complete its contract.

Explanation:

The corporate veil is an important instrument for protecting shareholders of corporations from being held liable for the liabilities of the corporation in their individual and personal capacities. Corporate veil ensures that the entity is treated as a separate entity from its shareholders. It is a protection offered by law to encourage private enterprise and ensure that the debts of corporate bodies are not tagged to the individual shareholders. It is this veil that ensures the limited liability concept, whereby, the shareholders could only lose their capital contributions in case of business failure or dissolution.

Piercing the corporate veil is a court decision to lift the veil that separates the shareholders of corporation from their shareholders. There are special factors that must be met for courts to pierce the corporate veil and they do it reluctantly.

5 0

3 years ago

If an agent injures a third party during the course of employment, to what extent should the employer be held liable? Under what

postnew [5]

Answer:

The employer will be held liable.

Explanation:

If the external agent brings harm or injury to a third party in the course of an employment, the employer is held liable. When a principal directs an agent to commit for a tort or if the principal is aware of the consequences of carrying the instructions of the agent could cause harm or injure the person, then the principal is liable.

It is called direct liability.

The liability for the intentional tort which is imputed to the principal when the agent acts to further the business of the principal.

The agent is personally liable under the following circumstances :

Foreign principal
Agent signs the contract in his own name
Non-existent principal
Principal cannot be sued:
Undisclosed principal

Example :

A credit card company hires a sales person and offers a company van to make sales in that area. The sales person uses the office van to official purposes. But one night, he drove the car to a friend's party and while coming he drove over a pedestrian. In this case, the owner of the company will not be held liable as the sales person uses the company van for his personal use while going out for party with his friends. While causing the accident, the sales person was not not using the office van for official purposes and was not tendering official duties at that time.

3 0

3 years ago

Bargaining associations are required to bargain without making any threats against buyers. true false

Debora [2.8K]

Workers typically obtain a larger proportion of productivity improvements as wages through collective bargaining. The given statement is true.

<h3>What is Bargaining associations?</h3>

The three primary categories of negotiation subjects are obligatory, permissible, and unlawful. The required category includes wages, health and safety, management rights, working conditions, and benefits. Topics that are permitted during the process are ones that are not required but may be discussed.

Workers typically obtain a larger proportion of productivity improvements as wages through collective bargaining. This can then encourage teamwork, boost productivity inside the company, and support stronger economic demand.

Union members typically receive greater wages, better health and pension benefits, and better working conditions. For people who decide to work in education, the advantages of unionization are essential. NEA members use collective bargaining to fight for causes other than their own financial stability.

To negotiate our union contract with the employer, including our pay, benefits, hours, holidays, sick days, staffing levels, seniority, safety, supplies, and other working conditions, a group of union members—our Bargaining Team—sits down with management. The given statement is true.

To learn more about Bargaining associations refer to:

brainly.com/question/1130553

#SPJ4

6 0

2 years ago

The manager of a shoe store noticed that mukluks were flying off the shelf in anticipation of another exceptionally cold winter.

Margarita [4]

Answer: The manufacturer, because the shoe store's revocation of its offer was too late.

Explanation:

Based on the scenario given in the question, if the store manager subsequently refuses the manufacturer's delivery on December 1, and thee manufacturer sues the shoe store for breach of contract, the manufacturer will prevail because the shoe store's revocation of its offer was too late.

According to the mailbox rule under the contract law, this is the default rule that's used to determine when an offer is considered to be accepted and when there's communication of the acceptance. In this case, the revocation is too late therefore the manufacturer will prevail.

5 0

3 years ago