It depends in if you noticed or not because if you did you would be responsible for telling them. if you didn't notice then it would be their responsibility.
hope that helped
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Should be.
Explanation:
From the efficiency perspective, we shall consider the relationship between the benefits and the costs. If we subtract the cost from the benefits and the result is positive, we could say that it is convenient to continue with the activities of the operations being carried out.
In that case, Jones's benefits are (100) but his cost is Smith's damages (60). Then:
100 - 60 = (+)40;
which implies Jones <em>should be</em> allowed to play his opera music.
Answer:
d.
Explanation:
Criminal law is a branch of the United States Justice System which deals with all types of crimes. Criminal law is mostly concerned with wrongs committed against the public as a whole. Such crimes include anything that can be perceived as being threatening or harmful to the property, health or safety of the population or an individual.
Explanation:
a. Ralph is in charge of the land, with an implicit right to payment in compliance with right doctrine (North American Oil Consol. v. Burnet (1932, S.Ct.) 286 US 414). This year, however, gross sales are made, although they may be reimbursed later.
b. Unless he returns money to Acme this year, Ralph will be able to claim a deduction of $5,000. Although Ralph originally paid the $1,750 tax on invoice and only saved $1,400 on the reduction of the refund and because the repayment timing resulted in an additional $350 tax. As the amount refunded to Ralph is more than $3,000 according to IRC§ 1341a. This is possible for Ralph to use the taxes accrued in the next year from the same refund to cover taxes. So Ralph will say a tax offset of $1,750 instead of a deduction of $5,000.
c.The sum of the deduction must be more than $3,000, according to IRC § 1341(a). Because Ralph spent just $2,500, he is not liable for tax reduction deductions, but can only claim a refund deduction.
Explanation:
Ray, the owner of a small corporation, ordered CPA Holmes to perform a record audit. Ray told Holmes that a loan application should include a prompt analysis of the audited financial statements of a bank. Holmes acknowledged the agreement unanimously and decided that an auditor's report should be given within 3 weeks. If the loan was granted, Ray accepted to pay Holmes a fixed fee plus a bonus.
Two accountant graduates were employed by Holmes to perform the audit and spent several hours saying exactly what to do. Holmes told the students to concentrate instead on providing accurate statistical facts in the documents and summing up a date that confirms Ray's financial statements that do not include footnotes, instead of testing the controls.
Holmes checked the documents and produced a report of the auditor without qualification. The article applies neither to the GAAPs nor to their consistent application.
