<h3>Amount of cost to the building is $69,645
</h3>
Explanation:
The total property value of Tonto Company = $140,000.
The total property (building, equipment and land) value of Tonto Company = $140,000.
The building was appraised at $98,000,
The land was appraised at $63,000
The equipment was appraised at $36,000.
- The total current value of the 3 assets = $98,000 + $63,000 + $36,000
- The total current value of the 3 assets = $197,000.
- Amount of cost to the building = ($98,000 x $140,000) / $197,000.
- Amount of cost to the building = $69,644.67
Amount of cost to the building = $69,645
Answer:
e. none of the above.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that your net profit per unit is none of the above. This is because since you are selling and the exercise price was set at $0.86 then the price lowering to 0.78 means that you sold at a much higher price than market value, which leads to about 0.08 profit per unit.
Answer:
To use quotations that enhance the position
to include reasons and evidence from research
to add examples that support the main idea
Explanation:
I don't know about the first one. I think and hope I am right. Good luck!
Probably when competition is most intense:)
Answer:
d.
The 2006 payment is included in 2006 GDP as government purchases, but the 2007 payment is not included in 2007 GDP.
Explanation:
The 2006 salary was of that year's service provided by the Economist. So it is included in 2006 GDP.
The retirement benefits in 2007 is a transfer payment by government where benefits are paid without any service to be received in return. Transfer payments are not included in GDP
