1. The Northern colonies were a refuge for religious dissenters, many of whom immigrated in families. Fewer families migrated to the Southern colonies because the South attracted people who were seeking economic prosperity.
2. Many people came to the Southern colonies from England because of limited opportunities in the old country. The English countryside was nearly fully occupied by farmers, but the American South had vast expanses of uninhabited, uncultivated land. Immigrants also came from Germany, Scotland and Ireland, and some of these people moved inland, away from the English, especially if they could not obtain fertile land near the coast. These inland Southern colonists faced hardship living in Indian country and wilderness.
3. Colonists in the Southern colonies experienced epidemics of yellow fever and malaria, which shortened life <span>expectancies</span>. These disease outbreaks did not plague the North as much. Life expectancy was even shorter for slaves abducted from Africa or other places. On some of the harsher plantations, slave life expectancy was only seven to nine years.
The effect that the use of biblical allusions have had on those who were listening to john winthrop's sermon "a model of christian charity" was that it helped the listeners see that their situation was similar to that of the ancient israelites; they, like the israelites, needed to obey god's commandments by loving god and one anothe
<h3>What was the Model of Christian Charity?</h3>
It articulated the God's high expectations for the settlement and explains the consequences of failure. His sermon was designed to unite the settlers by giving them a common goal and a common fate if they failed to achieve that goal.
His sermon urges his fellow Puritans not only to love God and one another, but "to walk in His ways and to keep His Commandments and His ordinance and His laws, and the articles of our Covenant with Him."
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Christian Charity
brainly.com/question/28151641
#SPJ1
Yes, some theories of the human person are against capital punishment such as the school of thought of Aristotle.
<h3>What is Capital Punishment?</h3>
This refers to the legally authorized killing of a person based on his capital crimes which usually involve the murder of another person or group of persons.
Hence, it is worth noting that while murder is widely condemned, there are some people like Aristotle who are against capital punishment as he believes that is not morally permissible.
Read more about capital punishment here:
brainly.com/question/7229220
An expansive understanding of powers granted to the federal government best describes if loose constructionism.
Loose Constructionism is the judicial philosophy whereby the constitution is interpreted loosely, typically analyzing between the lines, to extract a that means. When practicing loose constructionism, justices will take an difficulty and look at the context of it, and then on the constitution. Justices that are described as free constructionists tend to favour Federal government power over that of states strength and rights. They tend to be labelled as liberals.The notion that the charter must be interpreted on this way originates from the concept that when writing the constitution, it was left deliberately vague so that it can be interpreted on this manner, to allow it to be flexible. In addition to this is the belief that the Founding Fathers might not have known how the modern world could have looked, so wanted the charter to be interpreted in the present day.
Learn more about Loose Constructionism here:-
brainly.com/question/2511939
#SPJ4
