It would have knocked France out quickly enabling Germany to concentrate all her efforts on Russia
Answer:
- 'The law is "narrowly tailored" to achieve the compelling purpose, and uses the "least restrictive means" to achieve the purpose.'
Explanation:
As per 'strict scrutiny analysis,' in order to illustrate that a specific government action is constitutionally accurate, the government requires to demonstrate that the law is closely adapted in order to attain the compelling purpose by employing 'fewer conditional sources' that helps in attaining the desired purpose. Basically, the government needs to prove that the action is necessary to achieve the goal.
One good reason is that the were raised to not follow rules and they just don't care about the law.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure the answer is Thunder
Well, if you're talking about their attempts at apealling to Parliament, then they were not successful. When they resorted to larger and illegal ideas, like dumping the tea, they were much more successful. And since they won the war, I would say they were pretty successful.
