1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
JulijaS [17]
3 years ago
6

HEEELP! 15pts(:

History
1 answer:
Andreas93 [3]3 years ago
5 0
This is how I would go: (I'm just glossing over it, sorry if you think it lacks detail. :L) 
<span>1. California does not deserve a seat in the United Nations. </span>
<span>2. The UN is only for nations; people in California are US citizens; they do not have a culture nor a culture that is exclusive to the rest of the US. In this sense, California is not a nation. (this is the definition of a nation bit.) </span>
<span>3. Federalism, the system where states and national governments share power. California (states in general) does not have the power to enter into treaties with foreign countries, nor regulate commerce with foreign countries. These powers are exclusive to the national government. This would mean that it cannot be given a seat, where these powers would be put into California's hands. I guess states governments would also fit into here somewhere. </span>
You might be interested in
What did Stalin agree to do in return for the Allied invasion of France?
Svetach [21]

declare war on Japan once the Nazis were defeated is your answer.

In the years before the declaration of war by the USSR on Japan (following the two nuclear attacks on Hiroshima & Nagasaki), the USSR had tried to keep a good relationship with Japan to avoid fighting a two-front war (which would be extremely hard considering the great distance in between European Russia and Asia Russia. However, if USSR was able to defeat one and then the other, it would be easier.

This led to the decision to help the Allies take pressure off the landing of the French beaches (Sword, Juno, Omaha, Utah, etc), and was able to 'tie up' large amounts of German troops in the east.

In return, the USSR declared war on Japan following the bombing of Hiroshima & Nagasaki (as said above), and the declaration of war on Japan, leading to Japan's surrender.

~

5 0
3 years ago
Why is Attila the Hun a controversial historical figure? A. Historians don’t know much about the origin of the Huns. B. Although
Levart [38]

Answer:

The correct answer is:

Historians believe that he is a myth rather than a real historical person.

Attila the Hun Attila the Hun (405-453), also sometimes known with the nickname as Attila the Scourge of God (Flagellum Dei) or simply Attila was the most powerful king of the Huns. He reigned over what was then Europe's largest empire, from 434 until his death. His empire stretched from Germany and the Netherlands to the Ural river and from the Danube River to Poland and Estonia. During his rule, he was among the most dire of the Western and Eastern Roman Empire's enemies: he invaded the Balkans twice and besieged Constantinople in the second invasion; he marched through Gaul (modern day France) as far as Orleans before being defeated at the Battle of Chalons; and he drove the western emperor Valentinian III from his capital at Ravenna in 452. He was regarded as sacker of cities. In the year 453 Attilla was at his wedding party,got drunk,hit his head,and chocked on his own blood this is how Attilla died a terrible and unfair death.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
A town council wants to buy a new fire truck, but they first put it to a vote to spend the money. What concept of government dos
swat32
Popular sovereignty
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Panuto: Isulat ang CPG kung ito ay mga nagawa ni Carlos P. Garcia,
boyakko [2]

Answer:

Can you repost this in english please then i will answer the question

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Discuss the role of the Indians in the wars for empire from the 1690s through the 1760s. Were they simply pawns of the European
masha68 [24]
They had their own strategies and it would be foolish to think that they didn't have thier own desires and knowledge. They were choosing the European powers which they thought would serve their cause, that is why some supported one European power and the others supported another European power. Their role was great because they knew the ground well. 
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was Germany’s role in the discussions that ended with the Treaty of Versailles
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a part of the executive branch bureaucracy?
    13·1 answer
  • What product will power the 20th century
    7·2 answers
  • Which would a historian use most often to research people or events from the past? A. old books and papers B. old buildings and
    13·2 answers
  • the court set up in spanish in 1478 to make sure everyone in spain followed all the rules and belefs of the roman catolic church
    12·2 answers
  • Aeschylus, sophocles, and euripedes are most famous for their
    6·1 answer
  • With whom did John Sidell NOT have good relations? A. California B. Mexico C. Canada
    6·1 answer
  • How was Anne Hutchinson punished by the government of the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1638?
    5·2 answers
  • What idea was outlined in the Virginia Plan?
    12·1 answer
  • What nation started world war one and what two<br> nations escalated the conflict
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!