<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the second one, having to do with that fact that each faced foreign invasions, since neither had in place a sufficient defense system. </span></span>
<span>The King Philip's War ended in defeat for the Native Indians</span>
The statement that describes the distinction between British and French rule in Africa is D. France used direct rule, while Britain used indirect rule.
It should be noted that the main difference between the way the French and the British ruled African countries was that while the French used direct rule, the British used indirect rule.
The indirect rule implies a form of government whereby the governed people have certain legal, administrative, and other powers. While the British still have certain powers over the people they ruled, the French were direct in their approach.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25555071
Central powers (Germany and Austria -Hungarian empire mainly) were in WW1 , while the axis powers(Germany,Italy and Japan) were in WW2
