Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
They turned away from dangerous weather and asked Squanto for help with food.
It was created to protect the rights of each us citizen
Answer:
Ads.
Explanation:
Ads used by the advertisers to get attention of the consumers to buy new products because the ads attract the consumers by providing information to the consumers. In these ads, benefits of the product is mentioned so for that benefits people used the products that is seen in the ads so ads is the only way to attract consumers towards the new products and make profit from them.
The disagreement with the Catholic Church that was most influence by the Renaissance idea of humanism was that it was wrong for the Church to sell indulgences, since this implied that humans could not have a strong, individual relationship with God.