1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
swat32
2 years ago
12

"Do citizens have the right to protest a law they feel is an injustice?"

Social Studies
2 answers:
Elza [17]2 years ago
7 0
Yes they do. We have freedom of speech which is stated in the First Admendment.
PtichkaEL [24]2 years ago
4 0

Yes citizens have the right to protest a law they feel is injustice.  

No human rights instrument or national constitution grants a direct right to protest, but such a right is the manifestation of the right to freedom, the right to freedom of assemble, and the right to freedom of speech which protects the ability to express protest and to wear bands and arrange peaceful marches and protests on certain public lands.  


You might be interested in
Jack Block found that 23-year-olds who described themselves as being politically conservative were likely to have been described
Kruka [31]

Jack Block found that 23-year-old who described themselves as being politically conservative were likely to have been described as <u>guilty and anxious</u> at age 3.

<u>Explanation</u>:

Guilt is a feel expressed by the person, when he/she feels they had done something wrong. A person will feel guilt, when he violates his own ethics or morality. The unethical behavior of the person may cause physical or psychological pain to others.

The person feels nervous and uncomfortable when he is anxious. This kind of person is conservative in nature. They are always seen to be worried and stressed. Anxious people often gets fear on facing the crowd.

5 0
2 years ago
What separates guiana highland and Brazilian highland​
Ainat [17]

Answer:

what separates guiana highland and Brazilian highland

<em>➢</em><em> </em><em>Guiana Highlands, plateau and low-mountain region of South America located north of the Amazon and south of the Orinoco River. ... They are geologically similar to the Brazilian Highlands, from which they are separated by the eastern part of the Amazon lowland.</em>

Explanation:

<em>HOPE IT WILL HELP </em><em>YOU</em>

<em>kai6417</em>

<em>#</em><em>c</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>l</em><em>e</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>n</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>g</em>

4 0
2 years ago
Compare and contrast egyptian and nubian society. why is there so much more known about egypt? come up with at least five good r
lukranit [14]
Culture was beautiful

There gods are interesting

There seems to be so much theories on how they created the pyramids that we tend to want to learn about them

The kings ways of ruling was vicious

The pyramids is such a great wonder that we want to learn about them

Social media is a huge factor in this case
7 0
3 years ago
Jason is serving a two-year mission for his church at the age of 18. When he returns home from his mission assignment, he will d
3241004551 [841]

Answer: Moratorium

Explanation: Moratorium according to Marcia is one of the four main categories of identity development including identity diffusion, identity foreclosure status and identity achievement. During the Moratorium phase, individuals could be defined as being in an explorative or discovery phase, in search of an identity best suited for him or her among the various identity options available. This is the stage which preceeds the identity achievement stage. Jason in the scenario above, could be said to be in the Moratorium or exploratory phase after which he'll make a decision on his identity of choice, that is what to do about career and family.

7 0
3 years ago
Which U.S. Supreme Court case condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommun
sergey [27]

Miranda v. Arizona is the  U.S. Supreme Court case that condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommunicado, or making promises that can't be kept.

The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court ruling (1966) ruled that arrested persons have rights to self-discrimination and lawyers under the fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution.

The Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects must be informed of their constitutional rights against defense counsel and self-incrimination before cross-examinating police.

the majority opinion by Earl Warren. Article 5 of the Constitutional Amendment requires law enforcement authorities to advise suspects on their right to remain silent during police detention interrogations and to consult lawyers.

Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona here: brainly.com/question/1307890

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is a type of nationalism?
    7·1 answer
  • How does energy from the sun travel to Earth? Choose all that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • The polish government decided to use shock therapy because​
    6·1 answer
  • Explain how World War II<br> helped some African<br> Americans.
    12·1 answer
  • Which topic is often used as a theme for studying world history since world war 1
    15·2 answers
  • State theree difficulties that the Europeans<br>faced in reaching the interior parts of Africa​
    6·1 answer
  • The election results are as follows: Party A wins 45% of the vote. Party B wins 45% of the vote. Party C wins 10% of the vote. I
    8·1 answer
  • TRUE OR FALSE: Examples of domesticated animals are pigs, sheep, and cattle
    9·2 answers
  • Involves manipulating information mentally by forming concepts, solving problems, making decisions, and reflecting in a critical
    10·1 answer
  • To reduce the likelihood of negligent hiring lawsuits organizations should _____
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!