Lenin was a Marxist, as were his successors. He had a vision of making the Soviet Union a country where everyone will be equal, earning the same amount of money, everything will be available to everyone, the country to be self-sustainable. While this may seem as a nice idea, in practice in turned the total opposite. The Soviet Union became one huge concentration camp where around 30 million people lost their lives because they had another political opinion, belong to certain ethnic group, and were people that had it better and succeeded in life. The people were poor, often suffering from malnutrition because of the misjudged planning of the high officials. The economy was not in good condition and was developing very slowly. The country was ruled by a dictator that used violence in order to sort all the problems.
I don't understand your question!!!
<em><u>Answer:</u></em>
- Congress should have the authority to decide all issues.
<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>
Both Lincoln and Johnson's arrangement needed a brisk re-affirmation for the South.
Johnson's arrangement wasn't as eager to give as much opportunity to recently free slaves as Lincolns seemed to be.
In contrast to Johnson's arrangement, the arrangement they had needed to rebuff the south.
The Radical Republicans needed to rebuff the south to leave. They needed to remove the ex-confederates/supporters appropriate to cast a ballot. They considered it the Iron Clad Oath. They offered the most security to the liberated slaves, of each of the three plans, however they moan to generally profit white Northerners. They likewise looked to make a Black Code.
<span>The answer to your question is they were village-based cultures built around clans, they were also very poor</span>
Well, if a primary source says that a country one a historic battle, and we find rope and unfired weapons and a large amount of bones inside of the rope area, then the primary source is then questioned.
