Answer:
Response of Latin America to Policies Found in the Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary:
They were considered an unwelcome intrusion in Latin American affairs.
Explanation:
The Monroe Doctrine is the U.S. policy toward the Western Hemisphere, in which European nations were warned not to engage in further colonization of the geographical zone or continue the institutionalization of puppet monarchy in Latin America. It was delivered to Congress in December, 1823 during President James Monroe's message to Congress.
The Roosevelt Corollary of December 1904 stated that the United States would intervene as a last resort to ensure that other nations in the Western Hemisphere fulfilled their obligations to international creditors, and did not violate the rights of the United States or invite “foreign aggression to the detriment of the United States.
Latin American nations viewed the Monroe Doctrine policies and the Roosevelt Corollary as a combined intrusion into their sovereignty.
Answer:
Permanent houses, hospitals, schools and cultivation of crops.
Explanation:
Settling and staying in one area or location allowed humans to make permanent houses where they lived forever because that area has all the facilities available which is necessary for living. Humans also started to cultivate food crops instead of hunting in order to fulfill their food needs. Humans also make hospitals and educational institution for themselves in order to educate their children and maintain their health status.
Maximilian Robespierre,the leader of Jacobin party in France took several reforms. He followed a severe policy of severe punishment and control. His period was known as reign of terror. He forbidden the use of the most expensive white flour, issued laws placing maximum ceiling on wages and prizes.Jun 11, 2020
Here so the other guy gets brainiest :)
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
No, the due process was not followed. They violated the laws and rules of justice because the speedy trial leads to the violation of justice. If the trial is done with deep investigation so the man did not find guilty and then the violation of justice will not occur. so we can conclude from the discussion that the due process was not fully followed by the grand jury.
