The Texans believe they could win independence from Mexico because they knew they can outnumber the Mexicans four to one and overcome the power of the Mexican government.
<h3>What caused the
Texas Revolution?
</h3>
The main cause of the Texas Revolution was the refusal of many Texans to accept the governmental changes mandated by "Siete Leyes" which placed almost total power in their hands.
Hence, the Texans believe they could win independence from Mexico because they knew they can outnumber the Mexicans four to one and overcome the power of the Mexican government.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about Texas Revolution
<em>brainly.com/question/235330</em>
Answer:
Indeed, a citizen militia could be effective against the illegitimate attempt to install a dictatorship in the country through military force. In fact, one of the main limitations that the rulers in the United States have to fall back on authoritarian or dictatorial governments, in addition to the checks and balances system, is the constitutional right that American citizens have to own weapons, inserted in the Second Amendment. Thus, the rulers know that in the event of an illegitimate attempt to gain power, the American people could quickly organize in defense of democracy and civil liberties since they have the necessary elements to do so. That is why the organization of a citizen militia would be perfectly possible and effective in this situation.
Answer:
Engel v. Vitale
LAW CASE
WRITTEN BY: The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Engel v. Vitale, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 25, 1962, that voluntary prayer in public schools violated the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment prohibition of a state establishment of religion.
New York state’s Board of Regents wrote and authorized a voluntary nondenominational prayer that could be recited by students at the beginning of each school day. In 1958–59 a group of parents that included Steven Engel in Hyde Park, New York, objected to the prayer, which read, “Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers, and our country,” and sued the school board president, William Vitale. The prayer, which proponents argued was constitutional because it was voluntary and promoted the free exercise of religion (also protected in the First Amendment), was upheld by New York’s courts, prompting the petitioners to file a successful appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Engel et al. were supported by the American Civil Liberties Union, and briefs were filed on their behalf by the American Ethical Union and the American Jewish Committee, while the governments of some 20 states called on the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the prayer.
Oral arguments took place on April 3, 1962. The Supreme Court’s ruling was released on June 25 and found New York’s law unconstitutional by a margin of 6–1 (two justices did not participate in the decision). Hugo L. Black wrote the Supreme Court’s opinion, in which the majority argued “that, by using its public school system to encourage recitation of the Regents’ prayer, the State of New York has adopted a practice wholly inconsistent with the Establishment Clause.” The lone dissent came from Potter Stewart, who argued that the majority had “misapplied a great constitutional principle” and could not understand “how an ‘official religion’ is established by letting those who want to say a prayer say it. On the contrary, I think to deny the wish of these school children to join in reciting this prayer is to deny them the opportunity of sharing in the spiritual heritage of our Nation.” The decision, the first in which the Supreme Court had ruled unconstitutional public school sponsorship of religion, was unpopular with a broad segment of the American public.
Answer:
its really really good use this
