1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oksian1 [2.3K]
3 years ago
13

Which statement best describes the motivation of the character Pahom in Leo Tolstoy’s story “How Much Land Does a Man Need?”

History
1 answer:
maria [59]3 years ago
6 0
C I hope this helps........
You might be interested in
Which of these MOST accurately describes a result of Lyndon B. Johnson's Great Society programs?
TEA [102]
<span>federal spending was increased for education, housing, and healthcare
 
the great society program was similar in terms of policy to the New deal of 1930s in that it expanded federal spending in the  welfare of the </span>American people thus impacting on the lives of many people and removing them from poverty and lack of health cover.
7 0
3 years ago
Who led the Black men in the army that were kept in segregated units
Elanso [62]

Answer:

On July 26, 1948, President Harry S. Truman issued Executive Order 9981 establishing equality of treatment and opportunity in the U.S. military regardless of race. He appointed the President's Committee on Equality of Treatment and Opportunity in the Armed Services, two of whose five members were African American.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
20. why did navies create democracies
Alex73 [517]

Well, democracy is a Greek-born concept.

So, <em>When and why did democracy happen in ancient Greece?</em>

To Give vs To Receive

There are several variations of democracy as it is used in various nations today. Democracy now has as many influences as there are varieties of bananas available on the market thanks to historical events and thinkers. But whenever academics discuss the beginnings of democracy, they always go back to the same location. They reflect on this amazing civilization known as Ancient Greece.

If you imagine democracy to be a legacy of one great philosopher among ancient Greeks, you are dead wrong. In fact famous philosophers like Aristotle and Plato had many objections to democratic governments. For Aristotle, ordinary people such as <em>carpenters, soldiers, farmers</em>, had too many things to do in a day, they cannot be expected to cultivate "virtues". Virtue, in the eyes of Aristotle, is the domain for the elite class. A sector of society with sufficient wealth and leisure time for whom to devote time and effort to cultivate virtue without material gain comes naturally. For Aristotle, states should be governed by such people. I wouldn't be surprised if the etymology of <em>"Aristocrat" </em>has to do with Aristotle.

Neither did Plato say anything better. In fact, monarchies, dictators, and despots would find in Plato their inspiration. Plato saw a government governed at the top by a philosopher-king to be the best. Just as a healthy and just body is governed by knowledge and reason, a healthy and just society is one governed by a "lover of knowledge", hence the philosopher-king.

Democracy was not an invention of a great mind. It was invented by lesser minds. It was invented by people with a "war-like" character, invented by Greek warriors. People who were bellicose and cocky. A class of people who were eager to win material gain by pillaging other towns. In ancient times, to make war with other states with the aim of material gain was how states pursued economic development. From this breed of people came a battle formation which is admired up to this day: the phalanx.

In a phalanx, the Greeks arrayed themselves in close rectangular formation. Because the terrain of Greece is rugged, one particular size became effective often. It was 20 x 15, twenty men across, 15 men deep. Do the math and you will see 20 x 15 = 300.

Given that an individual warrior had the minimum battle skills, the success of the Phalanx depended on its cohesion. It had to march and maneuver as a group. Its success depended on coordination. Attack as one, retreat as one when needed. It had to stay together no matter what. I hope, my friends, you can imagine how unnerving it might have been for untested warriors to man the front line of a Phalanx. But true to their character, with grit and valor they manned their places in the formation.

My friends, I hope you are still with me on this page because I haven't said yet how the Phalanx gave rise to democracy.

When the Greek warriors, coming from battles, marched back to their states they divided the loot among themselves. If they won against an invading army, each recounted his deeds in the battlefield in front of his comrades in a gathering possibly organized at night, around bonfires. But when it came to issues of state policies, each demanded a voice in government. Because, each contributed to the success of the Phalanx, it was only fitting that the voice of each be heard. The Greeks agreed, and so it was sealed.

"Awuuu, awuuu, awuuuuuu", they said.

Phalanx gave rise to Democracy. It was put together by a class of men who from the standpoint of philosophers were lesser minds. But because ancient Greek warriors gave so much for the Phalanx to succeed, their voices were heard in government. They gave, and a lot they did.

Democracy was born in Athens between 700 BC and 500 BC..

My dear friends, let us look at our democracy now. Today the only righteous mind to keep in modern society, it seems, is the one that listens to the people. To listen to that sector of society we call the masses.

During the infancy of democracy, ancient Greek warriors gave a lot to their city-states which in turn won them a voice in government. But today, moral philosophy compels us to do differently. In modern democracy, moral philosophy compels governments to listen to the voice of the masses. But listen closely and you will hear it distinctly. Give us!

Where as, the ethical system of ancient Greek warriors compelled them to give in order to be heard, the ethical system of modern democracy compels the state to listen to those whose only longing is to receive. To give to the masses whose voice is one. Give us!

4 0
1 year ago
What was the Underground Railroad?
OLEGan [10]

Answer: C is the correct answer.

Explanation: The Underground Railroad was a fascinating series of homes and businesses that risked their freedom or sometimes their lives to help slaves reach freedom. They would hide and feed escaped slaves and give them directions to the next "stop" on the route.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did president carter worked to ease tensions with china
nlexa [21]
Carter continued, initiated by Richard Nixon's policy of normalizing relations with Beijing. January 1, 1979 the United States established full diplomatic relations with the Peoples Republic of China, thus withdrawing support for Taiwan.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did President Polk and the British settle their differences regarding the Oregon Country? They compromised on the border loc
    5·2 answers
  • What were the major boundary disputes resolved by john quincy adams
    11·2 answers
  • How did former slaves improve their lives during reconstruction?
    11·1 answer
  • Southeast asia, compared to the south asia realm, is:
    6·1 answer
  • What trait typical era is brought out in Washington lrving short story “the devil and Tom walker”?
    8·1 answer
  • How old was george washington when he died? Please help...
    13·2 answers
  • Who did the character of rosie the riveter symbolize?
    5·2 answers
  • Which nation was the world's economic leader after world war 1 A. Germany B. the United States C. German Americans D "irreconcil
    10·1 answer
  • The main purpose of elections ​
    11·1 answer
  • Question 6 of 10
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!