1. Our results showed that test tube B contained end products of protein digestion, meaning that the isolated enzyme has the ability to break down protein. The end products of protein digestion include small polypeptides, dipeptides, and amino acids. In general, test tube B will contain the building blocks of proteins, which are the amino acids.
2. The two test tubes were placed in a hot water bath at 37oC. This is because the enzyme studied is a human enzyme and it works best at the human body temperature, which is approximately 37oC.
Enzymes are biological catalysts, which means that they accelerate chemical reactions. As a result, an enzyme's activity is greatly affected by temperature. Every enzyme, depending on each function and origin, has a specific range of ideal temperature conditions. If the temperature rises above the maximum accepted, then the enzyme denatures and loses its structure.
3. If the enzyme studied was added in a tube containing starch instead of proteins, then nothing would happen. This is because the enzymes are highly specialized and have very specific actions. It has been proved that this enzyme's activity involves the digestion of proteins.
Starch is a polysaccharide produced by plants, this means that starch is a carbohydrate. Given that starch is not a protein, it will not be digested by the enzyme. An enzyme digesting proteins, will not have any effect on carbohydrates.
4. The smaller molecules which are the result of the digestion happening in the digestive system are absorbed by the human body. More specifically, the products of protein digestion are absorbed by the intestine and then transported into the bloodstream. From the blood, they are then absorbed by other tissues.
After they are absorbed, they are used to build muscles or other compounds which can produce energy.
Answer:
I believe D would be the answer
Explanation:
As in the first part the pseudo podium is engulfing the particle which is more similar to taking food and the next part in the phagosome the particle is engulfed and further the enzymes would be released which would digest the particle hence similar to digestion
A. The process of photosynthesis is energy-storing because the process converts light energy into chemical energy, which is stored in the bonds of glucose.
Answer:
A. Based on our results, students who do 1 hour of chores per night
have grades that are on average 0.2 points higher than students
who do no chores.
Explanation:
In a scientific experiment that employs the scientific method, series of steps should be followed. The steps involved in the scientific method include; making an observation/asking a question, formulating a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis, analyzing the result, drawing a conclusion etc.
From this step, we would notice that DRAWING CONCLUSION immediately follows the analysis of result, which means the conclusion is based on the result of the experiment. A conclusion in a scientific experiment should be factual and based on the measured result. It should either reject or accept the hypothesis.
The best representation of a conclusion is A. Based on our results, students who do 1 hour of chores per night have grades that are on average 0.2 points higher than students who do no chores. This statement has a conclusive content unlike other options that still seemed unlikely.
<span> For a start, when you have a question that needs answering in science, you formulate a null hypothesis. That is a negative statement which you then set out to prove or disprove. This is just a convention. So if your initial question is for example, "Does sugar dissolve in water?"
Your null hypothesis will be "Sugar does not dissolve in water."
You then set up your experiment and get some data.
Now if your data doesn't support your null hypothesis then you reject it and make the statement ,"Sugar does dissolve in water." As you can see from this simple example, a non-result is still a result so the idea of formulating new tests as mentioned by another answerer isn't necessary and in some ways is the incorrect thing to do. In science, hypotheses are often not supported by data and i would argue that this is the case a lot of the time. A non-result is still a result and you will have plenty to write about whichever way it goes. </span>
