Answer:
After people were asked not to sit in the seat behind the drivers in honor of Rosa Parks' fight for the Civil Rights movement, some people did actually sit in that seat. Making the assumption that these people were prejudiced or racist is an example of the correspondence bias.
Explanation:
On December 1st, 1955, Rosa Parks was commuting back home by bus, when the driver asked her and three other African Americans to stand up from their seats so that white passengers could seat there. While the three other passengers complied with the driver's order, Rosa Parks denied to do so, which ended up with her arrest, and later on with a social movement that decided to boycott the buses in Montgomery during Rosa Parks' trial. Although most of the people decided to leave the first seat behind the driver empty in honor of Rosa Parks, some of them actually seat on it anyways. Assuming that these people were racists is an example of a correspondence bias. A correspondence bias is the tendency to draw inferences about a person's personality based on a unique and specific observed behavior. There are many circumstances and reasons as to why that people sat on the seat that was meant to be empty that would not make them instantly perceived as racist or prejudiced, but assuming that they are based on that one action would be an example of a correspondence bias.
The correct answer is: "the Enlightment period".
The Enlighment movement emerged in Europe and was constituted by philosophers that promoted Reason and the scientific method over medieval superstition and religious dogmas, and the establishment of democratic societies where the power resided on its people, and not in monarchs or rulers "appointed by God". The resulting states enacted bills of civil rights for the first time in history, and implemented principles such as the division of powers or the social contract, through which citizens elected their governors by suffrage.
Such Enlightment principles were transferred to the American colonies, where the population claimed for political representation rather than being governed by foreigners that were appointed by a foreign king. Such claims were ignored and, influenced by the new democratic principles, the revolutionary movements for independence aroused.
Answer:
Options: Speaker A: The time of unlimited immigration is now past; controls are necessary to preserve the customs and values that have made this nation great.
Speaker B: In order to protect our citizens' jobs, restrictions must be placed on the number of immigrants.
Explanation:
In 1882, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act, which prevented all Chinese immigration in America. The Chinese Exclusion Act was a law forced during the Presidency of Chester A. Arthur. The Act banned all Chinese immigration for ten years and prohibited Chinese resident to be citizens in America.
Speaker A and B support the Chinese Exclusion Act as they state it necessary for America to save its culture and customs especially, immigrants from China. To protect jobs is another explanation for the support of this law that put restrictions on Chinese immigrants.
Answer:
Global population (more info below)
Explanation:
Global population increased due to increased sanitation, medicines, and food production. Hope I helped!
