The supreme court introduced a two-part test, known as the "Sherbert" test (or balancing test) to determine whether the government was violating an individual's "free exercise" of religion.
The Sherbert test guarantees that government doesn't take unjustified activities that obstruct a man's religious flexibility. The United States court framework has embraced the Sherbert test to decide whether the legislature has fittingly allowed or denied joblessness benefits in light of the job one's religion had in his or her job loss.
The test causes the courts to decide whether the individual's case of having a true religious conviction is exact and if the administration's activities load a man's capacity to follow up on his or her convictions. Moreover, the test requires the administration to decide whether it has acted to the state's advantage and on the off chance that it has done as such in a way that is slightest prohibitive to a man's religion.
Answer:
d) negative reinforcement by escape.
Explanation:
In operant conditioning, there are two kinds of actions that can strengthen a behavior: reinforcement and punishment. Reinforcement will make the subject to repeat a certain behavior. There are positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement. In this case, the mosquito is acting as a negative reinforcement. If Kevin doesn't use insect repellent, the mosquito will give an unpleasant stimulus by bites. Kevin escape the stimulus by using repellent before he mowing.
They helped reduce prices and made farming easier. the prices of slaves reduced allowing the South's economy to be stronger
the answer to this awful question is creative
The Equal Protection Clause is the correct answer.
The equal protection clause, found within the 14th amendment, has the purpose of protecting individuals' rights against discrimination. Under this provision, the same rights, privileges, and protection is guaranteed to all citizens. Therefore, this constitutional clause might be useful to support her case.
