It is false that the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions poses few threats to sustaining economic growth in developing countries.
Given that the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions poses few threats to sustaining economic growth in developing countries.
We are required to say whether the statement is true or false.
Economic growth basically defined as the increase or improvement in the inflation-adjusted market value of the goods and services produced by an economy over a certain period of time.
The reduction of carbon dioxide emissions does not poses threats but benefits our country and in result lead to increase in economic growth of the countries.
Hence it is false that the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions poses few threats to sustaining economic growth in developing countries.
Learn more about economic growth at brainly.com/question/1690575
#SPJ4
The hazard of the food worker that is most likely to make pasta unsafe to eat is;
A; Torn packaging fragments
Complete question is;
A food worker washes her hands before taking a torn package of dry pasta from the food storage area. She dumps the pasta In the stainless pot to cook.
What hazard is most likely to make pasta unsafe to eat?
A. Torn packaging fragments
B. Metal leaching from the pot
C. Pathogens from the worker’s hand
D. Soap residue from the worker’s hands
Food contamination can occur during packaging and storage of processed foods if the different quality standards that need to be followed are not observed.
Now, we are told that the package of dry pasta was torn before she put it into the stainless pot to cook. This means that ounce she washed her hands there is not likely to be any microbiological contamination but instead there will be chemical contamination that arises from fragments of the torn pasta package which could have entered inside it before putting into the cooking pot.
In conclusion, the hazard likely to have occurred to make the package unsafe to eat is called Torn packaging fragments.
Read more about food contamination at; brainly.com/question/12883271
Explanation:
it depends on which part he ran over. dogs are said to be of high strength, any action of inadequate pressure or power would not necessarily be fatal. if the right amount of energy is used at the right spot, for example an artery running through the neck ( like the carotid artery) or something. but since the dog apparently vanished, we could make out that it is not exactly dead
Object permanence. Meaning they think it is gone for good when it is out of their sight.
