Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
For normal distributions only, all data falls within approximately 68% of one standard deviation, 95% of two standard deviations, and close to 100% of three standard deviations. The standard deviation is far too small to represent two or three standard deviations, hence 
.
*Important: This problem would be unsolvable if the question did not say her cuts were normally distributed, because the information above is only applicable to normal distributions.
Answer/Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
< 
To solve, collect like terms.
Subtract 5w from both sides
< 
< 
< (incorrect)
The inequality given has no solution or an information is missing.
312211,13112221
Visual explanation in the attachment. I hope you'll understand ;)
Answer:
the estimated answer is B: 2.50.
<em>(</em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>exact</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>2</em><em>.</em><em>4</em><em>8</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>but</em><em> </em><em>rounding</em><em> </em><em>up</em><em> </em><em>would</em><em> </em><em>make</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>2</em><em>.</em><em>5</em><em>0</em><em>)</em>
Answer:
You should be thinking about a negative number. In fact, you should be thinking about a number that is the opposite of 5! -5! So, the additive inverse of 5 is -5
Step-by-step explanation:
