1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frutty [35]
2 years ago
6

What combat advantage did Spanish conquistadores have over native peoples

History
1 answer:
liraira [26]2 years ago
3 0

Their weapons were much more advanced ex. guns, rather than the natives had bows and arrows.

You might be interested in
The inclusion of Southean Democras in FDR S New Deal coalition meant that:
Nimfa-mama [501]
All of the above :)) hope this helped
4 0
3 years ago
Which means of delivering mail went out of business in 1861 after the completion of the transcontinental telegraph?
KATRIN_1 [288]

the answer is B: u.s postal service

7 0
3 years ago
What does bubonic refer to
Minchanka [31]

Answer: if referring to history, bubonic can be tied to the Bubonic Plague also known as the Black Death. This is a disease which causes swelling of lymph nodes.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What was the main effect of the system of debt peonage that emerged in the South during the late 19th century?
Natali [406]
<span>African Americans labored in a system that was nearly the same as slavery.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 6(Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people
kirza4 [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,

However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.

The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."

We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.

Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.

The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The blank blank becomes president of the us if the president dies
    5·2 answers
  • What are characteristic of scientific question
    13·1 answer
  • Need help on government
    5·1 answer
  • The cuban missile crisis revolved around the placement of missiles in the soviet union. b. occurred when cuba threatened to atta
    8·1 answer
  • Match each word with the phrase that best defines it.
    14·1 answer
  • The Romans set up a separation of what?
    5·1 answer
  • How did the black plague affect the city of florence
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true?
    14·2 answers
  • What has the necessary and proper clause of the Constitution been used to do?
    5·1 answer
  • What is another name used for the Utrecht Psalter?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!