Well it's certainly one of them. I don't think that in this speech Torvald is really trying to make her obedient and controlled, but I'm not a woman. Women might take it that way, I've no doubt. He speaks with affection calling her "my little spendthrift." He's not telling her to take everything she bought back. He's just making a comment. He did speak a little sharply at the beginning of his line, so if you think that's about obedience and control, go with it.
To Nora it's about Christmas. I don't think it's entirely about money or he would be really reaming her out. She knows they can afford it. Of the first 2 I'd pick the first one.
No one is deceived. Again, he'd really be after her if he thought that.
They are both realistic. They just see things differently. Ah yes. They married!!!
Their marriage isn't breaking down. Not here anyway.
A and B for 2 answers
B or A for just one.
Later on in the play it turns out that it is very much about money and deceit and a marriage that is having problems. but all that is in act 2 far away from this scene. I don't know which one of the 2 to pick. There are too many things going on to really pick if you are going to bring the rest of the play into it. There's blackmail, a betrayal of trust, a woman fed up with her circumstances. It's all very complex.
They both are based off the same thing
The fallacy fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when it is claimed that if an argument contains a logical fallacy, the proposition it was used to support is wrong. A true statement can be defended using false logic, so using false logic to defend an opinion is not proof of the opinion being wrong.
At the time of Kennedy's presidency no one was still very nice to the Africans. The time of the Civil Rights movement was about to be at its peak and when when Kennedy did this speech he said it as in a way to say, "Hey, no matter what heritage you belong to or what your skin tone is, we should all be friendly to each other and help each other out." That was his way of asking for equality and the peace for the Africans. He wanted them to have the same rights as the white men had at the time. "Without regard to his race or color" meant that everyone that was different should still be together and not worry about that because it did not matter as long as they all agreed in a uniform idea that would be the best for the country and its people.
The logical fallacy which occurs in this case is a fallacy called Causal Fallacy, which in short words is when you explain something with the not necessarily true cause. this is calledin latin <em>non causa pro causa</em> which means,this is not cause for this cause. For example, people see a sports car crashed on the street. Immediately they blame the sports car driver for driving too fast. This is a false cause, because despite a sports car can be fast, that was not necessarily the cause of the accident.