1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lapo4ka [179]
3 years ago
5

Explain the bakke case how did it begin and how did it end?

History
1 answer:
mr Goodwill [35]3 years ago
3 0
Bakke sued the University of California , and they were stating that the school's medical admission policy was violating The Civil Rights Act and The 14th amendments promise of the equality protection clause. The California's supreme court ruled in the favor of Bakke, by rejecting their policy. They agreed, the policy was against people of race, "No applicant  may be rejected because of his race, in favor of another who is less qualified..."
You might be interested in
Which countries gained their independence in the years immediately following World War II? Select all that apply.
PIT_PIT [208]
India, Indonesia, and Russia
8 0
3 years ago
How do Arab nations regard the U.S. military presence?
grigory [225]
Americans and Arabs of the Persian Gulf do not have common values and culture.
3 0
3 years ago
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following themes were most commonly explored in American art and literature of the early nineteenth century?
Vlad1618 [11]
I think love, romance and betrayal ( I’m not sure tho)
4 0
3 years ago
What is the definition of bounty?
Klio2033 [76]

A sum paid for killing or capturing a wanted person


3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If most Americans have a generally unfavorable view of communism, both now and in the 1950’s, why is Joe McCarthy considered a v
    5·1 answer
  • What is Piney woods natural resources I need help plz
    10·1 answer
  • Darlings, could you help me with this question?
    15·2 answers
  • If all students of Mr. McNulty's class are awesome and you are a student in Mr. McNulty's class then you are awesome.
    13·1 answer
  • During the Korean war, which of these individuals wished to avoid a
    12·1 answer
  • 2. How many Chinese peasants became addicted to opium during this time?
    9·1 answer
  • In the X.Y.Z affair, these letters stood for:
    9·1 answer
  • What kind of government do they have on the Island of Sala-ma-Sond under Yurtle?
    10·1 answer
  • List five ways China influenced Japanese culture from 600s-1100s.
    15·1 answer
  • Explain how the French and Indian War changed the borders of the Georgia Colony.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!