Answer:
$31,100
Explanation:
On May 31 of the current year, the assets and liabilities of Riser, Inc. are as follows: Cash $20,500; Accounts Receivable, $7,250; Supplies, $650; Equipment, $12,000; Accounts Payable, $9,300.
Therefore the amount of stockholders’ equity as of May 31 of the current year can be derived by the formula : Capital = Assets - Liabilities
<u>Assets</u>
Cash $20,500;
Accounts Receivable, $7,250;
Supplies, $650;
Equipment, $12,000
TOTAL = 40,400
<u>Liabilities</u>
Accounts Payable, $9,300.
Therefore stockholders’ equity = 40,400 - 9,300 = $31,100
Answer:
•Discovery
• Data
• Analyze
• Ethical
Explanation:
• Discovery . Here, there are observations of events or actions which bring about new knowledge that will be further exposed to new hypothesis.
• Data . Raw data(qualitative- non numerical and quantitative -numerical) are collected in this stage and then processed to become information.
• Analyze . This is a stage where the processed data and information are analyzed. It is where the data are cleaned, inspected, transformed and then modeled with the aim of making meaningful insights, drawing conclusion and then support further decision making.
• Ethical. In this stage, researchers check to determine whether their procedures are ethical or not. This is where the data analysed are checked whether they conform with the correct rule of conduct.
Answer: Spreadsheets
Explanation: Spreadsheets allow you to
foresee and edit data, while also seeing
the past data to help towards ones
future business goals.
Answer:
Gross Profit 714,000
Explanation:
Gross Proft: is the diference between the sales revenue and the cost of the goods sold.
Sales revenue 1,254,000
Cost of Goods Sold (540,000)
Gross Profit 714,000
note: All the other account and values are irrelevant to determinate the gross profit.
<u>Other way to calculate gross profit:</u>
(sale price per unit - cost per unit) x unit sold
Answer:
There are no options listed, but what I can tell you for sure is that John's actions were both unethical and illegal.
What John did is unethical because it is not moral and it goes against all the principles that guide professional conduct. John also did something illegal because he was an accomplice in committing fraud against the company. He knowingly benefited from the accountant's illegal actions, and that is basically the legal definition of an accomplice to a crime.