1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elza [17]
4 years ago
9

Which issue did the Supreme Court answer in the case of Duncan v. Louisiana?

History
2 answers:
Serhud [2]4 years ago
4 0

The answer is: During the Duncan vs Louisiana case, the Supreme Court answered whether the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial applies to the states or not.


The Duncan Vs Louisiana was a very significant ruling by the Supreme Court and it incorporated the 6th Amendement right to a jury trial in all States.


The case took place in 1968 during the time of huge racial tensions. Gary Duncan was the name of a 19 year old teenage African-American boy who was charged with battery in the State of Louisiana without a jury trial.

With an appeal, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Duncan 7-2 and ensuring that every person has the right to a jury trial.

Monica [59]4 years ago
3 0

<u><em>1968 Duncan v. Louisiana demanded the Supreme Court to ascertain whether a state could refuse someone the freedom to a claim by jury. The Supreme Court found that a person afflicted with sedate criminal malfeasance is confirmed a tribunal trial supported by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.</em></u>

Further Explanation:

Duncan v. Louisiana petitioned the Supreme Court to ascertain whether a state could refuse anyone right to a hearing by jury. The resolution declared that not all criminal aggression is "severe" sufficiently to demand a tribunal trial supported the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court legislated it apparently that insignificant attacks did not demand a lawsuit by jury, supporting the popular traditional law practice of applying a tribunal hearing to arbitrate petty crimes. The Justices concluded that there was neither "strong indication" that the Composers of the Constitution intended to guarantee the right to a hearing by judges for small charges. To segregate a "severe crime" from a "small crime," the court observed to District of Columbia v. Clawans. In such a case, the court used scientific standards and concentrated on the current laws and methods in national courts to ascertain whether an insignificant attack demanded a jury trial. In Duncan v. Louisiana, the majority assessed models in the national tribunals, state tribunals, and American constitutional practices of 18th century to command that a crime condemned by up to two years in penitentiary could not be charged a small malfeasance.

Learn more:

1. What was the status of us workplace safety laws in 1900? brainly.com/question/1233502

2. Problem on the establishment clause. brainly.com/question/10628112

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Duncan Vs Louisiana Case

Keywords:

Duncan, lawsuit , legislated, Columbia, district , model , crime , guarantee, criminal , tribunal , practice judge.

You might be interested in
Tip of advice: Dont cheat on all your work. Once you get into the next grade or assignment, you will not have a clue whats going
Andru [333]

Felt that, I have no idea what to do in Spanish class, lol.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The following bodies of water are part of the Middle East region
Novay_Z [31]
Arabian Sea, Red Sea, and Caspian Sea
8 0
4 years ago
Whose side did the Native Americans ultimately<br> take?
LiRa [457]

Answer:

Because so many Native Americans sided with the British, the U.S. felt justified in appropriating Indian lands and dispossessing them by “right of conquest.” One of the goals of the Revolution had been westward expansion (as indicated by complaints about the Proclamation Line of 1763).

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
how were the political reforms that took place in Britain similar to the reforms that took place in France
Juliette [100K]
During the French Revolution, French men had universal suffrage. Later in Britain, this suffrage was expanded incrementally to cover all men of all classes and stature.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the Jim Crow laws?
defon
They were laws in the early history of the American south which legalized the segregation between blacks and whites.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the United States the largest number of sheep are raised in the _____.
    6·2 answers
  • Why are discussion and deliberation important in addressing gun violence?
    9·2 answers
  • Interesting facts about peter the great?
    5·1 answer
  • Who is da best? one answer is correct
    10·2 answers
  • Where did the early Inca settle​
    5·2 answers
  • After the Bolsheviks signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, why did Russians revolt against them?
    11·1 answer
  • Which challenges did pioneers typically face on the Santa Fe Trail in the mid-1800s?
    13·2 answers
  • 1. Which of the following is stated in the Third Amendment?
    8·2 answers
  • What historic African region was located
    7·1 answer
  • Regarding the continuation of American participation in the Atlantic Slave Trade, slaveowning delegates to the Constitution held
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!