1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elza [17]
4 years ago
9

Which issue did the Supreme Court answer in the case of Duncan v. Louisiana?

History
2 answers:
Serhud [2]4 years ago
4 0

The answer is: During the Duncan vs Louisiana case, the Supreme Court answered whether the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial applies to the states or not.


The Duncan Vs Louisiana was a very significant ruling by the Supreme Court and it incorporated the 6th Amendement right to a jury trial in all States.


The case took place in 1968 during the time of huge racial tensions. Gary Duncan was the name of a 19 year old teenage African-American boy who was charged with battery in the State of Louisiana without a jury trial.

With an appeal, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Duncan 7-2 and ensuring that every person has the right to a jury trial.

Monica [59]4 years ago
3 0

<u><em>1968 Duncan v. Louisiana demanded the Supreme Court to ascertain whether a state could refuse someone the freedom to a claim by jury. The Supreme Court found that a person afflicted with sedate criminal malfeasance is confirmed a tribunal trial supported by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.</em></u>

Further Explanation:

Duncan v. Louisiana petitioned the Supreme Court to ascertain whether a state could refuse anyone right to a hearing by jury. The resolution declared that not all criminal aggression is "severe" sufficiently to demand a tribunal trial supported the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court legislated it apparently that insignificant attacks did not demand a lawsuit by jury, supporting the popular traditional law practice of applying a tribunal hearing to arbitrate petty crimes. The Justices concluded that there was neither "strong indication" that the Composers of the Constitution intended to guarantee the right to a hearing by judges for small charges. To segregate a "severe crime" from a "small crime," the court observed to District of Columbia v. Clawans. In such a case, the court used scientific standards and concentrated on the current laws and methods in national courts to ascertain whether an insignificant attack demanded a jury trial. In Duncan v. Louisiana, the majority assessed models in the national tribunals, state tribunals, and American constitutional practices of 18th century to command that a crime condemned by up to two years in penitentiary could not be charged a small malfeasance.

Learn more:

1. What was the status of us workplace safety laws in 1900? brainly.com/question/1233502

2. Problem on the establishment clause. brainly.com/question/10628112

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Duncan Vs Louisiana Case

Keywords:

Duncan, lawsuit , legislated, Columbia, district , model , crime , guarantee, criminal , tribunal , practice judge.

You might be interested in
Why was farming was the economic basis for the manor system? ask.com?
antoniya [11.8K]
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
8 0
4 years ago
Land with different territories under a single rule
valentina_108 [34]
A land with different territories under a single rule is an empire.
3 0
3 years ago
Distinguish between your constitutional rights in a school vs. your constitutional rights outside of school.
spayn [35]

The case on point to help with this divide is Tinker v. Des Moines.

The general rule is that you have more rights outside the school than inside the school.

Inside the school, you have speech rights but only to the extent that the speech doesn't substantially disrupt the school environment.

3 0
3 years ago
Trình bày những đóng góp của Các Mác trong việc hoàn thiện học thuyết giá trị - lao động
Korolek [52]
Sorry I don’t understand
3 0
3 years ago
Consider the statement, "It is better that ten guilty persons go free than that one innocent person be punished." What can you i
lara31 [8.8K]
It can be said that society wants to punish the guilty;however, they are cautious when doing so.  Society is afraid that the justice system is placing an innocent person behind bars for every ten people that are being set free.  Our judicial system was put in place to protect the innocent and put the guilty behind bars; however, this is not so.  We have a corrupt society that contradicts itself from the lowest court system to the highest government powers of Congress.  When one political power takes control, it's like a gang or "mafia" take over with the people suffering without a voice.
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did England establish the Georgia colony?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the federalist-controlled congress pass the alien and sedition acts?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Christianity rise as the Roman empire was on a decline?
    8·2 answers
  • Which empire is best known for
    8·2 answers
  • Sylvia deposits $50 into a savings account with a 2% interest rate. Using the formula for simple interest, how much will she hav
    11·1 answer
  • The Serbs and Bosnians showed ________________ because they had strong feelings of pride about their ________________, and they
    5·1 answer
  • True or False: The Japanese achieved their objective of crippling the US Navy and keeping the US from helping other countries in
    5·2 answers
  • How do you think trade affected the development of regional civilizations?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did congress decided the winner of the election of 1824
    6·1 answer
  • Asap cold war dbq
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!