Just by looking at the answer you can take out D because C already offers no tax and 5% off, do C is better than D, so we only have to do t math for A, B, and CA is 800 plus tax, with $75 back800×1.05 (because it's 5% tax) -75 =$765B is 800×.90 (because 10% off means he's paying 90%)×.05=$756C is 800×.95 (because 5% off means he's paying 95%) =760A=765B=756C=760So B is the best deal
:)
Answer:
Efficiency requires that one lighthouse is built since the willingness to pay of all the residents together is larger than the cost of providing the lighthouse
Explanation:
Since the lighthouse is a public good, according to the coase theorem, if the combined willingness to pay for the lighthouse of all of the people living on the islands is higher than the cost of the lighthouse, then a lighthouse should be built.
The total willingness to pay is:
The population willingness to pay is higher than the cost of building one lighthouse ($2000) but lower than the cost of building two lighthouses ($4000). Therefore, efficiency requires that one lighthouse is built since the willingness to pay of all the residents together is larger than the cost of providing the lighthouse.
Answer:
A) 0%
Explanation:
The unemployment rate in the town of Marble Falls refers to the portion of the active population which is not employed
Initially, there were 2 people actively searching for means of livelihood, six weeks down the line, they lost interest in job search, which means that by then, they were no longer in the unemployed category since they have stopped looking for job opportunities.
In essence, when the 2 people left the unemployed category, no one was left, which translated into the unemployment rate for the town of Marble Falls
Answer: Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
The opportunity cost of attending college for Brooke is the amount that she could earn as an actress i.e. $2 million per year.
The opportunity cost of attending college for Sandy is the amount that he could earn by serving hamburgers i.e. $10,000 a year.
Therefore, opportunity cost of attending college is greater for Brooke than for Sandy.
an example of an I statement would be d: I feel hurt when you ignore me at meetings; it makes me think that you don’t value my opinion.
