man only has the gift of wisdom, the power to think. we learn new things everyday. we learn from our mistakes. we learn from what we see. we learn from what hear and feel too. we also implement this knowledge in daily life. think of a situation in which you purposely touched fire to know how you would feel, you burned yourself. next time , would u do it purposefully. never. because you just implemented what you learned from your mistake in real life. its not about having knowledge, its knowing how to use it.....
PLZ MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST PLZZ CLICK THANKS RATE THE ANSWER ALSO
Answer:
“You should get those”
“I really like that one”
“These, these are the one”
“Come on let’s get this”
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer to your question is C.
The explanation for Option C:- raise an objection to his own opinion and counter that argument is:
On May 31, 1988 President Ronald Reagan addressed the students and faculty at Moscow State University (MSU). Although previous presidents desired such an opportunity, no other U.S. president except Richard M. Nixon had stood east of the Berlin Wall and spoken directly to the citizens of the Soviet Union. That Reagan would have such an opportunity was highly unlikely. Reagan appeared to be an implacable foe of the Soviet Union, previously calling it an "evil empire," describing it as "the focus of evil in the modern world," and accusing the Soviet "regime" of being "barbaric."
Thus, Reagan equated freedom with progress. Specifically, his thesis argued that human rights equal individual freedom; freedom equals individual creativity; individual creativity equals technological progress. The essence of the argument in Reagan's MSU address can be summarized as it follows:
There is a revolution taking place. It is spreading around the globe.
Hope this helps! :3
<span>To establish verisimilitude
To tell stories efficiently, requiring minimal mental effort on the part of viewers
To approximate the experience of real time by following human actions
To construct an imaginary 180-degree space in which the action will develop</span>
For he thinks that this kind of friendship can exist only when one spends a great deal of time with the other person, participating in joint activities and engaging in mutually beneficial behavior; and one cannot cooperate on these close terms with every member of the political community.
