It can be very scary or not scary
Answer:
1.It makes an overly general statement about people.
2.It claims that “out with the old, in with the new” has caused people to stop loving antique architecture, without providing any evidence.
Explanation:
Got it right on a test
1. Imprecise. The chef will not know how long he has to cook.
2. Vagueness. We are not sure how many politician exactly.
3. Incomplete meaning. We just know tall students are allowed to play basketball, but there are no further explanations.
4. Vagueness. We are not sure how many lies do the Prime Minister say.
5. Lexical ambiguity. The word "suspects" have two meanings in this sentence. The first one is a person thought to be guilty of a crime or offence. The second is a person who commits robbery.
6. Syntactic abiguilty. We are not sure whether peter's wallet was stolen by General Office or was found by General Office.
7. I am not sure with this question.
8. Equivocation. Common has been used for two times but with different meanings.
9. I am not sure with this question.
10. Referential ambiguity. We are not sure which article exactly. They should provide the name of the article
Hope this help you
Believe the continuous trust fraud