Answer:
Grade C. Inspection Aid 106 Universal Sizer, Inspection Aid 107 USDA Pea Sizer.
Explanation:
I think so...
Answer:
Tessie Hutchinson is stoned to death to appease forces desiring a sacrificial lamb offered in atonement for the sins of others, with no questions asked.
Explanation:
The random persecution is done according to the rules of the lottery. The rules have long been the ritual which seems logical to the villagers. However, there is no reason behind the annual persecution. People just blindly follow the tradition and the leader in the village, regardless of the fact whether that person should die or not. It is a collective murder. Society wrongfully designates scapegoats to bear the sins of the community.
Answer:
the option supporting the given inferences from <em>A Doll's house </em>are -
option A, option C and Option E.
Explanation:
Option A, "the same little feather head", says, Nora is a little feather head, connoting the <em>childishness of Nora</em>.
Option C, "That is like a woman", says that Nora is like <em>womanly kiddish</em>, as the male chauvinism of the society suggests.
Option E, “What is this! Is my little squirrel out of temper?”, says that Nora is presented again a little and that to squirrel who are among the <em>small creature with loose temper.</em>
<u>Describe, in your own words, Sartre’s idea of the importance of reality and how that concept informs his view of cowardice.</u>
In his 1946 work <em>"Existentialism is Humanism",</em> Sartre explores existentialism and its effect on humanity. He states that a <u>coward</u> is: <em>"defined by the deed that he has done. What people feel obscurely, and with horror, is that the coward as we present him is guilty of being a coward." </em>The action of the coward defines him, an aspect that can be changed only by him. If he is committed to change what defines him, he can erase the notion of being a coward.
Nevertheless, Sartre mentions that “<em>There is no reality except in action</em>”, and this reveals the <u>importance of reality</u>. Humans, regardless of the outcome of an unattainable future, are still in control of some aspects of their reality through their actions; thus, they can shape their individual futures in a way.
This is <u><em>"total freedom"</em></u> defined solely by the individual, as Sartre says: <em>"Those who hide from this total freedom, in a guise of solemnity or with deterministic excuses, I shall call cowards." </em>What matters in someone's existence is what is decided. A <u>decision </u>is going to shape someone's reality and will define whether the person is a <em>hero</em> or a <em>coward</em>.<em> </em>
Answer:
your answer is a. hope it helps.