<span>This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S.
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
</span>
Answer:
In the clarification segment follows, the definition of the query is mentioned.
Explanation:
His professional primarily observes how Bill tries to do his job. Bill does how it works heartily, and indeed the boss essentially observes not when the bill is committed to his task.
<u>Appraisal technique:</u>
- Throughout this circumstance, the methodology of management analysis that comes with 360-degree feedback is used. The performance assessment of this methodology is carried out by administrators.
- This analysis involves employee performance reviews received by managers and a senior manager's appraisal of staff.
