Answer:
1.con
Individual rights are restricted. The goal of Communism is to have people working toward common goals and needs. For that reason, people are not free to pursue their own interests. Their job assignments are based on what the community requires for survival. Someone might be a great writer on comparing pros and cons of subjects, but if the community needs an auto mechanic for the common good, then guess what that writer gets to be? An auto mechanic.
2.pro
Almost everyone is educated. Because the goal is to improve the society as a whole, many individuals are sent through advanced schooling so their skill sets can be improved. Although the choice of subject may be restricted and other limitations may apply, just about everyone in a true Communist society is offered the chance to seek out an advanced degree.
Explanation:
Answer:
To pay reparations after World War I, Germany printed more money.
Explanation:
After the end of World War I in November 1918, France and Great Britain imposed on the defeated Germany the payment of war reparations for the destruction caused during the conflict.
The German government issued paper money to pay the reparations of war, calling Papiermark to these new issues. Due to the emergencies arising from the conflict, the Papiermark lacked of gold backing and was not convertible into this precious metal, which was an unusual situation for the time, where the gold standard scheme required all the paper money issues of a country were backed by gold, precisely to guarantee its value. As a result of this situation, Germany entered into a period of hyperinflation.
HI
Yes he was a good Roman leader because he knew how to control the Romans very well so he was very respected.
I hope that's help:0
Personal Freedom can only be guaranteed in a rule where the person can decide who rules.
Explanation:
In communism the state has the highest power, over the people.
That means that the state can decide when to restrict the movement of the people or to take away their personal freedom from them if the state deigns it so.
In democracy that is not possible.
The personal freedom of movement and of expression are some of the inalienable rights of a true democracy.
No matter what happens these are the rights that are enshrined to a democracy safeguarded by the elections.
Hope it help :)
Squanto (native American) helped to communicate with the "Pilgrims".
