1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rama09 [41]
3 years ago
5

On January 1, 2018, the stockholders’ equity section of Nance Corporation shows: Common stock ($2 par value) $1,200,000; paid-in

capital in excess of par value $2,500,000; and retained earnings $1,000,000. During the year, the following treasury stock transactions occurred.
Mar. 1 Purchased 30,000 shares for cash at $22 per share.
Jul. 1 Sold 6,000 treasury shares for cash at $27 per share.
Sept. 1 Sold 5,000 treasury shares for cash at $19 per share.
Dec. 1 Sold 5,000 treasury shares for cash at $12 per share.

Prepare the journal entries.
Business
1 answer:
olganol [36]3 years ago
8 0

Explanation:

Date                             Particulars                                  Debit            Credit

Mar.1           Treasury Stock (30,000*22)                      660,000

                              Cash                                                                     660,000

Jul.1              Cash ( 6,000*27)                                        162,000

                           Paid in Capital from Treasury Stock                       30,000                

                           Treasury Stock (6,000*22)                                     132,000

Sep.1            Cash (5,000*19)                                             95,000

                    Paid in Capital from Treasury Stock             15,000

                              Treasury Stock (5,000*22)                                  110,000  

Dec.1            Cash (5,000*12)                                             60,000  

                    Paid in Capital from Treasury Stock             50,000

                              Treasury Stock (5,000*22)                                  110,000  

Note: When company sold out the Treasury Stock more than its purchase price, the Paid in Capital increases from Treasury Stock and recorded as credit. However, when company sold Treasury Stock less than its purchase price, the Paid in Capital decreases from Treasury Stock and recorded as debit.    

You might be interested in
Benz Company is considering the purchase of a machine that costs $100,000, has a useful life of 18 years, and no salvage value.
Marysya12 [62]

Answer:

B. $14,600

Explanation:

The annual cash inflows associated with the machine can be found by the following expression, where 'r' is the company's discount rate of 12% and 'n' is the useful life of the equipment of 18 years:

-investment+ X*\frac{(1 - (1 + r)^{-n})}{r} =NPV\\\\-\$100,000 + X*\frac{(1 - (1 + r)^{-n})}{r} =\$5,850\\-\$100,000 + X*\frac{(1 - (1 + 0.12)^{-18})}{0.12} =\$5,850\\X=\frac{\$105,850}{7.25} \\X=\$14,600

Annual cash inflows are $14,600.

8 0
2 years ago
What was Thomas Malthus’s theory of population growth?
Rufina [12.5K]

Answer:

A population would grow faster than its ability to feed itself.

Explanation:

Thomas Malthus' theory, in my personal beliefs, is remarkably accurate and quite rational. He argued that if one were to have a country/population left unchecked, as in without any form of administration, government, or central authority to balance it, that a population would thus outgrow its resources and thus result in overpopulation and a lack of necessities... something that may, perhaps, lead to eventual extinction.

This is fairly factual when you think of the contemporary age. The earth was previously believed to have a carrying capacity of about 2-40 billion people, an argument that eventually centered on around 7 billion. Today, the earth's maximum carrying capacity is generally percieved to be about 9 billion people. In this age, we currently are nearing 8 billion.

This. Is. An. Issue.

A plethora of earth's resources that life itself depends on is LIMITED. Our freshwater reserves are limited. The amount of animals on this planet, a source of food, is <em>also </em>limited. The amount of plants on this planet, significant sources of energy, food, oxygen, and all sorts of natural processes that keep everything alive, are, unfortunately, limited.

This demands that humans figure a way to require less of these precious resources, fast. By the year of 2150, we'll likely have surpassed our carrying capacity.

For the issue of food, there are options. The primary issue is that humans are omnivores, as in, we love both plants AND animals... in our stomach's, of course. A prime example is myself! Personally, I couldn't live without beef, but I <em>definitely </em>couldn't or wouldn't want to survive without spinach and broccoli, because they are absolutely delicious.

However, despite humans being omnivores, we stubbornly refuse to eat our veggies. . . meaning a mass majority of us prefer to eat meat. We breed our animals to have offspring, giving us more meat. We generically enhance or even create our meat. We love meat.

The issue being that meat is a terrible source of energy. Remember, energy comes from sources of life itself, like the sun! PLANTS take the mass majority of this energy in, not animals. Animals EAT the plants, to where as much as 80% of that initial energy source is lost, disappearing into nothing, and meaning only roughly 20% is absorbed into the animal upon eating the said plant. Then, and only then, HUMANS come to eat the animal, in which 80% of that initial 20% is also lost between these stages.

As you can see, humans end up with barely any amount of this vital energy, simply because we love meat. We feed the plants to the animals to keep them healthy so WE can then eat the said animals, thus resulting in a HUGE loss of energy. We use our land for pastures. We give other resources (like water) to the animals, again, so we can eventually consume them.

The earth is going to run out of resources at one point or another, but our current consumption habits will likely hasten this process as far as freshwater and food.

Ofc, it shouldn't need to be said that if we were ALL to switch to primarily plant-only consumption, we'd probably be set. Getting rid of all our pastures and replacing them with massive farms would give is a surplus of plants, which are remarkably better sources of energy and will thus be able to sustain humans much, much longer. We won't have to worry as much about starving.

Then again, you must ALSO worry about the fragility of plants. They can easily be detroyed by natural disastors and are dependant upon environmental conditions such as weather temperature, climate, and soil. These factors are very limiting, but then you must additionally remember the amount of care they require, as well as they are extremely vunerable to mass destruction (like droughts, burning, flooding, etc., which can wipe out a LOT at once).

Obviously it's a give-or-take thing.

Malthus said it right, three hundred years ago.

I get the length of this post was probably uneccesary but you asked a very good question that gave me an excuse to cover something in-depth.

I am inevitable.

~Troy

3 0
3 years ago
A company developed the following per-unit standards for its product: 2 pounds of direct materials at $4 per pound. Last month,
olga nikolaevna [1]

Answer:

Direct Material Price Variance = $300 Favorable

Explanation:

Direct Material Price Variance = (Standard Price - Actual Price) \times Actual Quantity

Standard Price = $4 per pound

Actual Price = \frac{Actual\ Cost}{Actual\ Units} = \frac{5,700}{1,500} = 3.8

Since the actual price is less than the standard price the variance will be favorable as the amount paid for actual use is less then the estimated standard cost.

Thus, direct material price variance = ($4 - $3.8) \times 1,500

= $300 Favorable

7 0
2 years ago
1.The percentage of the labor force that belongs to a union is known as the
Helen [10]
1) The percentage of the labor force that belongs to a union is known as the UNIONIZED PERCENTAGE RATIO.

2) The equilibrium wage rate is determined by the point of intersection of labor market supply and labor market demand. Equilibrium wage is the wage where the company agrees to pay and the worker agrees as the value of his work.

3) The effect of union exclusion of nonunion workers is to lower the wages of nonunion workers.

4) A market with one buyer and one seller is a bilateral monopoly. Monopoly is a market with only one seller. Monopsony is a market with only one buyer.
4 0
3 years ago
What law created the federal reserve system?
S_A_V [24]
Federal reserve act D
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lauer Corporation has provided the following information about one of its laptop computers: Date Transaction Number of Units Cos
    12·1 answer
  • If you put $700 in a savings account at an interest rate of 3 percent, how much money will you have in one year?
    9·1 answer
  • The basic summary device of accounting is the
    7·1 answer
  • Boyce Manufacturing Co.'s operates 3 profit centers. The clothing center’s static budget at 6,000 units of production includes $
    7·2 answers
  • If one is injured during the process of saving a life, the person who was trying to help is protected by what law?
    5·2 answers
  • Do you have, or have you ever had test-taking anxiety? What strategies will you use to manage test anxiety?​
    7·1 answer
  • Strategic use of white space improves document readability. Which of the following techniques employ white space?
    10·1 answer
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly. While executing a project, it is important to express mutual_____
    12·1 answer
  • How often does the price you pay for a haircut change? What does your answer imply about the usefulness of market-clearing model
    10·1 answer
  • juliana was assigned to analyze the process her company uses to write proposals. she worked on her report for more than a month.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!