1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ivolga24 [154]
4 years ago
13

Finish this statement: Although most historians agree on the names, dates, and places of historical events, they

History
2 answers:
AVprozaik [17]4 years ago
7 0
Often disagree on the significance and long term meaning of those events
forsale [732]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The correct option would be b

Explanation:

Historians often disagree on the significance and long term meaning of those events. This is largely due to different people, believe several different causes that lead to another major milestone in history. They have their own reasons to cite which they believe could be more contributing than what others think

You might be interested in
How is freedom defined under the bush doctrine?
Mademuasel [1]
It's defined by a judicial standard based on a hierarchy of constitutional rights, so that some constitutional freedoms are entitled to a greater protection than others.
7 0
3 years ago
What role does the goverment play in socialism?
serg [7]
The government doesn't control all of America
5 0
4 years ago
What were Religious artifacts that the Phrygian Civilization had ?
Nina [5.8K]

Explanation:

The Phrygians (Greek: Φρύγες, Phruges or Phryges; Turkish: Frigler or Frigyalılar) were an ancient Indo-European speaking people, initially dwelling in the southern Balkans – according to Herodotus – under the name of Bryges (Briges), changing it to Phryges after their final migration to Anatolia, via the Hellespont. However, the Balkan origins of the Phrygians are debated by modern scholars.[1][2]

4 0
3 years ago
According to Calhoun , what should states do if their rights were violated?
Vanyuwa [196]

Answer:

rebel

Explanation:

A state should veto any federal law that went beyond the enumerated powers of the state if their rights were violated

4 0
3 years ago
Why were the colonists upset about the stamp act
Step2247 [10]
The colonists were upset because this was the first time Britain had really bothered them. Up until that point, Britain had left the colonies alone, but when the Stamp Act was put in place the colonists realized that Britain thought they were above the colonies. Colonists didn't like that Britain was forcing them to pay, either. The Stamp Act put a tax on all printed things. Colonists were also angry because they weren't represented in Parliament (British Government) and one of their beliefs was in representation. 
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Thomas Paine was a political writer who fervently supported the American Revolution. In this excerpt from his popular work Commo
    8·2 answers
  • At the beginning of the war, how did the new military technology affect the way european leaders thought about the war?
    10·1 answer
  • This Mongolian home is known as
    8·2 answers
  • When did Harriet Tubman Die?
    6·1 answer
  • Did the The northern region see the introduction of supporting businesses developed due to the farming industry?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did big business emerge during the Industrial Revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • The battle of Britain was?
    10·1 answer
  • The Rough Riders, led by Teddy
    8·2 answers
  • What amendment is <br> A student’s cell phone is searched
    11·1 answer
  • HURRY PLS ( 50 POINTS AND MARKED AS BRAINLESS)
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!