Answer:
A family farm.
Explanation:
During World War II, the domestic scenario within the American territory was called "home front", where families and all those individuals who were not in the combat zone, both in Europe and in the Pacific, were morally obliged to contribute to the war effort, both through the labor effort in the production of armaments, supplies and food for the military in battle, as well as through the saving of own resources to generate surpluses that contribute with said resources destined to the armed forces.
Thus, family farms, which generated food for each family group, thus saving productive effort for it to be destined for the armed forces, were an essential part of the home front during the war.
Answer:
They ended civil unrest in the empire.
Explanation:
I took the test yesterday and it was right.
<span>The question is asking us to choose among the options. The background is that "The British Empire once controlled modern-day India. While many British historians once defended Great Britain's Right to rule over foreign colonies, British historians today largely take a negative view of such colonialism. Which of the following best explains why this change in interpretation might have occurred?" Here, the major reason is that the values changed - before, people believed in the superiority of white people while now it is believed that all people are equal. This means that they have different subjective options that influence how they see the events - biases. So the best answer is:
B. Historians today have different biases than previous historians.</span><span />
