Answer:
d.acted properly in this case
Explanation:
The court acted properly in fining the company as well, the company has the obligation to examine the conducts of its employee and ensure they are ethical. Hence, for the companies failure in carrying out the oversight function, the company is implicit in the criminal conduct of Sarah.
1. They are not sure if they are making the right decision
2.two parties may not be enough
3.they are not educated enough
4.they are not a citizens
<u>Answer:
</u>
The newspaper editor could be convicted of violating the Sedition Act.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The United States government, in an attempt to limit the negative word being spread about the functioning of the government, expanded the girth of the Espionage Act of 1917 to include anti-government speech and published writings into the list of crimes under the said act.
- This move came in during World War I as the number of individuals criticizing the decision of the government to participate in the war was increasing considerably.
- The act was named by the government as the 'Sedition Act of 1918'.
I believe it was the goal of the Isolationist because they were an anti-war group.
You fail the class possibly get summer school but wont affect you in anything and depending on the course it is you will probably still graduate<span />
