1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marina86 [1]
3 years ago
12

Young people have historically failed to participate in the election process - fower young people vote than those of other

History
1 answer:
zysi [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Scientists explain the estrangement of youth from politics, as well as political absenteeism by the following factors:

The first factor - society itself is the reason for the decline in the activity of the young generation and the development of political exclusion in the youth environment. The second factor - the interests of young people are currently focused on the problems of maintaining their existence and survival in modern conditions. The third factor is that young people, on the one hand, do not see the need to radically change anything in the current way of life, and on the other, they do not consider political activity as meaningful for themselves, finding more promising ways and areas of self-affirmation and personal self-realization.

Millennials are full of reasons to push for political change. But the “youth wave" is still a myth. As a result of this, power is chosen not by young and creative people, but by the average majority living 'by yesterday and today.'

Explanation:

You might be interested in
(Word after WW1)
AysviL [449]
I would say 1. The light bulb because candles were far more of a fire hazard and a lot less light 2. Electric heater because again a lot less of a fire hazard and less prep work 3.electric refrigerator because you could safely store food for a long time with out spoil and or deep freezer for the same reason. Edit: some of this you might want to reword.
6 0
2 years ago
What events lead up to the slave trade compromise
Anna007 [38]

Essentially, it had to do with political power. Slave-holding states wanted to include slaves who were unable to cast ballots in their political representation in Congress. Non-slave states perceived this as a ruse to exert influence over the newly formed government. This topic has been covered in a lot of writing. Contrary to some who assert that shows how the founders thought about black people, they address the problem of political representation. Since they now had more representation in the halls of government than the non-slave states, many in the slave states viewed this as a victory. Most individuals who opposed slavery simply wanted to count the free people in a population, but those who supported it wanted to count slaves as well. As a result, slave owners would be represented in the Electoral College and the House of Representatives by a greater number of seats. Numerous ratios were taken into consideration, including three-fourths, half, and one-quarter. James Madison would propose the Three-Fifths Compromise after much discussion. The Three-Fifths Compromise was not accepted by all of the states, and the Articles of Confederation needed a unanimous vote. As a result, the Compromise was not ratified until the Constitutional Convention. The Three-Fifths Compromise would dramatically increase slave-owning states' political clout and representation. If the Southern states had been represented equally, 33 seats in the House of Representatives would have gone to them. However, as a result of the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Southern states did have 47 seats in the House of Representatives of the first American Congress in 1790. As a result, by accumulating enough political influence, the South would be able to take control of presidential elections.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is the U.S. Secretary of State important?
Jet001 [13]

Answer:

They are so important because they handle all foreign affairs.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How do you summarize this?
Gre4nikov [31]
Where is the attachment or picture?
5 0
3 years ago
What fertility rate is needed to replace the population of people dying
Andrej [43]

Answer:

2.1 children per family

Explanation:

When the total fertility rate is at replacement (2.1 children per family), the two children born essentially replace the parents when they die. The replacement level TFR is 2.1, not 2.0, since not all females survive to their childbearing years.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was there a need for Reconstruction of the South?
    5·2 answers
  • What happened as a result of J.P. Morgan's work in the financial industry?
    9·1 answer
  • This navigational device is an example of what Islamic artistic technique?
    9·1 answer
  • 1. A rich soll made up of sand and mud deposited by running water is known as ____ soil
    5·1 answer
  • What was one benefit of living in cities? Question 5 options: Cities protected crops and livestock from flood waters Low populat
    8·1 answer
  • In the area of economics and big business, what are three things that President Wilson accomplished?
    6·2 answers
  • Thomas Paine's pamphlet Common Sense
    7·2 answers
  • Please help !!!How big a problemas lynching? Who did the lynching?​
    15·1 answer
  • What architectural achievement of Nebuchadnezzar II is considered one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World? Ishtar Gate O H
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME QUICK!!!!
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!