The conflict between US and the Philippine that lasted from February 4, 1899 to July 2, 1902 is known as Philippine-American War. Although the Filipino nationalities called it struggle for independence, but US government referred to it as a rebellion.
Both American and Filipino soldiers committed atrocities towards each other, they considered Filipino as dogs and killed men, women and children. Several reports informs us that after entering a village the soldiers used to plunder church, houses and use to rob the villagers. They even fired upon those who waved flag for signalling truce. In many cases the Americans retaliated death of their soldiers by burning the town and killing all the natives.
The result of the American-Spanish war was not good for the native Filipino population as it replaces one oppressor (Spanish) and placed other (United States) in its place. American liberators soon turned into traitors for the commercial advantage of Philippines island. The native Filipinos continued to shed their blood for independence, their villages were burnt to the ground and brutal practices were used to collect information from them. No authority took interest to check on these atrocities. Some historians claim that the United States has caused more damage to the Filipino population than the 300-year rule of Spaniards.
In response to the Berlin wall the United States created the Berlin airlift. Supplies were sent on planes and dropped into Berlin. These supplies included things such as food and water.
The answer would be option A) Israel expanded its borders, while Arab states lost land. This best summarizes the result of major conflicts between Israel and Arab states.
I think, Hungarian nobles tried to reject Joseph's decrees on the grounds that he had not gone through an official coronation there. Even peasants were often more concerned with the taxes that the empire demanded than with their new freedoms.
It is probably more nearly correct to state that the Northern states offered more fertile soil for industrialization to grow and prosper than the South. The comments above about slavery are misstated. The Southern economy was indeed agrarian and dependent upon slave labor; however the reason for this is was that the economy in that portion of the country consisted of large scale plantations of staple crops, primarily cotton. It is manifestly incorrect to state...
