Answer:
(1)
Fees revenues 42,600
Total expenses 1.92 x 4260 = 8179.2
<em>Net income 34,420.8</em>
<em>(2)</em>
Fees revenues 42,600
Variable cost 2,982
Contribution Margin 39,618
Fixed Cost 14,400
Net Income 25,218
Explanation:
(1)
We multiply by the garment cleaned
10 x 4,260 = 42,600
0.7 x 4,260 = 2982
and distribute the fixed cost among the normal capacity
14,400 / 7,500 = 1.92 fixed cost per garment cleaned
.7 + 1.92 = 2.62 cost per garment
(2)
We do not include the fixed cost in the unit cost, we subtact them completely as an expense.
Answer:
The answer is: Yes, an exchange was made.
Explanation:
In marketing, an exchange happens every time two or more entities (people. organizations or businesses) trade products or services. Each trade should result in a utility created for each party involved. In other words, what you get in exchange is worth more (at least for you) than what you give.
In Amanda's case, an exchange is made because she donated blood and received a feeling of satisfaction and happiness in exchange.
Answer:
M1 $2,530 billion
M2 $10,644 billion
Explanation:
- M1 = Currency held + Travelers check + Checkable deposits
= $(1,124 + 4 + 1,402) billion = $2,530 billion
- M2 = M1 + Savings deposits + Time deposits + Money market funds
= $(2,530 + 6,884 + 583 + 647) billion = $10,644 billion
Answer:
Hence the null hypothesis is not rejected.
We conclude that productivity objective (in dollars) is not better than $75,000 per employee.
Explanation:
Single sample t-test ( upper tail test)
N=20
Mean =75500
Sd=18968.117
DF= 20-1=19
Table value of t at 0.05 level of significance =1.7291
Calculated t=0.1179 < table value 1.7291
The null hypothesis is not rejected
We conclude that productivity objective (in dollars) is not better than $75,000 per employee
