the answer to that question is D;')
I'm answering the literal and metaphorical question.
Say you have two rivers that are parallel and symmetrical, any little disturbance or alteration to the direction of one of will gradually make them end up in very different locations (may take years, but will happen 100%). Also, the geography of the land probably will not be the same, further making the destination of the two rivers very distant.
Now imagine two friends that have grown up in a married, middle class, family, they have went to the same school, had similar career goals, and hang out with the same friends. Friend one plans to be a nurse and the other a veterinarian. They start out the same, but as the education there're career(s) require, the farther they end up. Life is unpredictable and NOTHING is ever guaranteed.
Hope this enlightens people, this is my first answer.
A conjunction is a part of speech that connects words, phrases, clauses, and sentences. This makes a conjunctive adverb a type of adverb that joins together two clauses or sentences.
Answer:
You would use <em>was</em>.
Explanation:
Using "were" in this sense, while it <em>is</em> past tense, doesn't make sense. It is not grammatically correct. If you notice "lunch" is not plural, meaning "were" would not fit it. You would use "was" for it to be grammatically correct.
Here's what the sentence would look like if you used <em>were</em>: "Lunches for the guests were prepared yesterday."
If you were to use "was", the sentence would be: "Lunch for the guests was prepared yesterday.", because the "lunch" is singular. Making <u>this</u> the correct sentence.
I hope this helps!
(Sorry for the mess up!)
-No one
Answer: this is an opinionated question
Explanation:
I think you can achieve your goal by setting aside work and entertainment, this makes it easier for you to focus
