If you were writing an argument for why students should be allowed to bring cell phones into their classrooms at school, which r
eason would NOT be relevant to that argument? NOTE: Relevant means 'closely connected.' A) Cell phones are necessary to ensure student safety in case of an emergency. B) Cell phones have lots of games on them that can entertain students during "downtimes." C) Cell phones allow parents to be in immediate contact with their child in case of an emergency. D) So long as students do not actually use cell phones in class, the phones are not a disturbance to learning.
B is irrelevant because school is a place for learning therefore not a place to be playing around imagine someone saying this to you as an argument! Would you take them seriously?
just change the "Hey yall so some of you know me but for those of you who do not know me my name is skye" try and put this "Hey I'm (name) and I will be telling you on why we should (then put whatever ur talking about)