Answer:
It is departmentalized in a functional way
Explanation:
Functional departmentalization is the type of organizational structure based on common job functions. In Mitchell's case all similar jobs, like legal or marketing, are grouped in one place or on the same floor. This type of organization provides space for further employee's specialization by putting staff in places where their skills can further develop.
Due to the first rule of labor markets, a firm strives to maximize its profits and will therefore never pay more for a worker than the value of his/her marginal productivity to the firm. Therefore, the option A holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of profit maximization?</h3>
A process of following and adapting such methods that derive maximum revenue to the firm is known as profit maximization. It should be the primary goal of any firm in the market.
The first rule of labor markets says that when a firm strives for profit maximization, it does not pay the worker or the labor, more than the marginal productivity that the worker bring to the firm.
Therefore, the option A holds true regarding profit maximization.
Learn more about profit maximization here:
brainly.com/question/17233964
#SPJ4
The question seems to be missing. The complete question has been added for better reference.
Due to the ________ a firm strives to maximize its profits and will therefore never pay more for a worker than the value of his/her marginal productivity to the firm.
a. first rule of labor markets
b. demand product value
c. third rule of labor markets
Answer:
$20,880
Explanation:
Under the direct method we ignore services that are provided to the other service departments.
In order to allocate the building operation costs to Operating department A, we need to determine what percentage of the building space taken up by Operating departments is used by Operation Department A.
There is a total of 50000 square feet and Operating Department A occupies 60%(30000/50000 of that.
So Operating Department A will get 60% of the building costs
i.e., 60% × 34800 = 20,880
So lets say we have two investment opportunities. A new convenient store in your neighborhood or a new shopping center more than 5 miles away from where you live... What would you invest in well lets look at the pros and cons of each investment. So even though the new convenient store is right around the corner from you and prices are low the new shopping center has better products, warranty and higher prices unlike the convenient store closer to you. So we have an investment budget of $1000 dollars and want to spend it wisely we need to access what has a better chance of being successful with what you put into it. So the convenient store will reach less people has a bargain price but also doesn't have security cameras. Even though the shopping center has great employees, top-of-the-line products, high security, and a great establishment but also has flaws. What are you gonna invest in, will you take risks? My personal opinion is that I would invest in the shopping center because more people would be attracted to it because of the quality of service and products. So it would have a better probability in success and good use of my money.
Answer:
Interest rates would rise.
Explanation:
There would be a decrease in the amount of loanable funds borrowed.
if the government were to increase the tax on interest income, a reduction in the amount of funds borrowed would happen because the cost of borrowing would then become higher and people would have to pay more than they would have paid for every amount borrowed
