Answer:
Film makeup has evolved from theater makeup. However, with time, film makeup has become very advanced. Films have the luxury of post-production, which give the producers time to correct the look of the actors, in case it is not up to the mark. Theater makeup, however, needs to be perfect because theaters have a live audience. Bad makeup or the wrong costume can ruin an entire scene. Theater artists also tend to use loud makeup. This is also because they perform before a live audience and the audience needs to see the actors from a distance. On the other hand, in movies, an actor may have to give multiple shots before a scene is canned. The actors usually have their makeup touched up between shots.
In films, elaborate sets can support the plot of the story well, but theater often has limitations to depict a location or a setting. Thus, in theater, the right makeup and costume can help in supporting the plot. For a theater performance, makeup application may not take more than an hour. However, in films, makeup artists start five to six hours prior to the actual shot taken.
Theater artists rarely depend on 3D dimensional effects such as prosthetics and latex. This is because theater makeup is not usually as complicated as film makeup. Along with makeup, costumes and hair styling play an equally important role in films and theater.
Lighting is a very important aspect of both film and theater makeup. In both instances, the lighting has to be appropriate to justify the character.
Explanation:
"Not only does it allow for more skilled and qualified workers to assist with the employment needs of businesses and thereby support the economic growth of the country, immigration in Canada also reunites families and supports refugees in establishing a new life."
that is in fact false I wish you a merry christmas
hope I could help
By 1774, the year leading up to the Revolutionary War, trouble was brewing in America. Parliament (England's Congress) had been passing laws placing taxes on the colonists in America. There had been the Sugar Act in 1764, the Stamp Act the following year, and a variety of other laws that were meant to get money from the colonists for Great Britain. The colonists did not like these laws.
Great Britain was passing these laws because of the French and Indian War, which had ended in 1763. That war, which had been fought in North America, left Great Britain with a huge debt that had to be paid. Parliament said it had fought the long and costly war to protect its American subjects from the powerful French in Canada. Parliament said it was right to tax the American colonists to help pay the bills for the war
Most Americans disagreed. They believed that England had fought the expensive war mostly to strengthen its empire and increase its wealth, not to benefit its American subjects. Also, Parliament was elected by people living in England, and the colonists felt that lawmakers living in England could not understand the colonists' needs. The colonists felt that since they did not take part in voting for members of Parliament in England they were not represented in Parliament. So Parliament did not have the right to take their money by imposing taxes. "No taxation without representation" became the American rallying cry.
