Answer with explanation:
The equation of any line with slope 'm' and passing through any point
is given by

As we know that the general equation of a line with slope 'm' is 
Comparing with the given equation
we can conclude slope of the given line is 
Now we know that the product of slopes of perpendicular lines is -1
Mathematically we can write for perpendicular lines

Thus the slope of the required line is obtained from the above relation since it is given that they are perpendicular

Hence using the given and the obtained values the equation of the required line is

Part b)
The angle of intersection between 2 lines with slopes
is given by

Comparing the equations of given lines

with the standard equation we get

Thus the angle of intersection becomes

3 × 
expressing as a whole number, using the digits available, we obtain
3
Now consider the position of the decimal point in the original 0.003
To get it back to where it should be we require to move the decimal point 3 places to the left , denoted by a negative exponent
0.003 = 3 × 
Answer:
−9x 2 -44-4x
Step-by-step explanation:
1 Simplifica -5{x}^{2}-43-1−5x
2
−43−1 a -5{x}^{2}-44−5x
2
−44.
-5{x}^{2}-44-4{x}^{2}-4x
−5x
2
−44−4x
2
−4x
2 Colecciona los términos semejantes.
(-5{x}^{2}-4{x}^{2})-44-4x
(−5x
2
−4x
2
)−44−4x
3 Simplifica.
-9{x}^{2}-44-4x
−9x
2
−44−4x
listo espero te halla ayudado
Answer:
12 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
(7 + X) × 8 - 4 × X = 56
7 + X × 8 - 4 × X = 56
7 + 8X - 4 × X = 56
7 + 8X - 4X = 56
7 + 4X = 56
4X = 56 - 7
X = 49/4
X = 12 1/4
The first thief takes (1/2 x + 1) . What remains ? x - (1/2x + 1)
So the 2nd thief takes 2/3 of [ x - (1/2x + 1) ]
What remains ? x - 2/3 [ x - (1/2x + 1) ]
So the 3rd thief takes 2/3 of { x - 2/3 [ x - (1/2x + 1) ] } and he takes 1 more .
What remains ? x - ( 2/3 { x - 2/3 [ x - (1/2x + 1) ] } + 1 )
And that whole ugly thing is equal to ' 1 ', so you can solve it for 'x'..
The whole problem from here on is an exercise in simplifying
an expression with a bunch of 'nested' parentheses in it.
===============================================
This is a lot harder than just solving the problem with logic and
waving your hands in the air. Here's how you would do that:
Start from the end and work backwards:
-- One diamond is left.
-- Before the 3rd thief took 1 more, there were 2.
-- That was 1/3 of what was there before the 3rd man took 2/3.
So he found 6 when he arrived.
-- 6 was 1/3 of what was there before the second thief helped himself.
So there were 18 when the 2nd man arrived.
-- 18 was 1 less than what was there before the first thief took 1 extra.
So he took his 1 extra from 19.
-- 19 was the remaining after the first man took 1/2 of all on the table.
So there were 38 on the table when he arrived.
Thank you for your generous 5 points.